[dtn] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-dtn-bpsec-18: (with COMMENT)
Alissa Cooper via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 06 February 2020 13:33 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: dtn@ietf.org
Delivered-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E5B612006B; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 05:33:54 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Alissa Cooper via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-dtn-bpsec@ietf.org, Scott Burleigh <Scott.C.Burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov>, dtn-chairs@ietf.org, Scott.C.Burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov, dtn@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.117.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
Message-ID: <158099603411.12272.4523908707537197688.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2020 05:33:54 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dtn/_nckrhoDpHuepGDYuszQM9If2QU>
Subject: [dtn] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-dtn-bpsec-18: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dtn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "Delay Tolerant Networking \(DTN\) discussion list at the IETF." <dtn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dtn/>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2020 13:33:54 -0000
Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dtn-bpsec-18: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dtn-bpsec/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I support Mirja's and Benjamin's DISCUSSes. In Section 3.8: "o It is RECOMMENDED that designers carefully consider the effect of setting flags that either discard the block or delete the bundle in the event that this block cannot be processed. o The BCB block processing control flags can be set independently from the processing control flags of the security target(s). The setting of such flags SHOULD be an implementation/policy decision for the encrypting node." Both of these uses of normative language seem inappropriate.
- [dtn] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-… Alissa Cooper via Datatracker
- Re: [dtn] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-i… Birrane, Edward J.