IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dtn] on obsoleting RFC5050

Carlo Caini <carlo.caini@unibo.it> Thu, 17 October 2019 13:29 UTC

Return-Path: <carlo.caini@unibo.it>
X-Original-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C7751200E3 for <dtn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 06:29:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=liveunibo.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OVm9Uwh0taBJ for <dtn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 06:29:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR02-VE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-ve1eur02on072e.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fe06::72e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 837D112008A for <dtn@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 06:29:02 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=dnYCfQ04rMHe7fF7LPUfuToiOQbFMZww7MCpFiv6AbqZDHRb7jaxyFxhlVW9OULiFBxnLSkAc7cPSq3FWJOhvOhMakDsH//Fupx5f934A/I2821U4XCYOFUNqB45nzDeRUBKoyAYWXvsc1xf3d1k96yRbJaMv9kJLGEEwRHVP34Wd5IfUMVlMq0mdVSyzYE8AChjOO27MnsWulX2+8UcEjYM+tbemhIzFSuekX1b+nFKDudQdDJRMA5UeGr0HUZcFjah5sZpZhOVTB++xZcEH2MfUpGnywi9o8TzK4h0bL8c7zuJMTJssahTDa/y8R176BHFeJIRrvgq1r2rSqbA2Q==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=KuDOvF3HhF9G6zEj4TWG3BMdsDsSGrLwh8efQxvFfck=; b=mdBS5EvDgOkJRWLawlcPTnyrFmAxJCrNGw2hHB1XzB5L1RzV1SyZcMyIAzaNLvHKupDLttIfwXfSotyI1TaSkGSMa1x43iNRkTtmbxotFrnz781ww4bAr0U/OUpepT9NlHgP7GvW4Cfe6qM0a4phC4LXWXpcNEG7phgcXTebTKMUoXpC3+FtCoLEu13pFUjlHGj+MWB8pl55/6UkWWuXFGfWHXLXW6cCBZQJDuPvItPU4k9/GJfNe+hD19Mah7bDTndT/P52xwRCGOYrDbMleeExAXC9cMtOV9cbgG5iiQrCbrMoCzl6QlaxhmD4MpJ0GSiW7A0kYSmWH0TX/18QZg==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=unibo.it; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=unibo.it; dkim=pass header.d=unibo.it; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=liveunibo.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-liveunibo-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=KuDOvF3HhF9G6zEj4TWG3BMdsDsSGrLwh8efQxvFfck=; b=AZ6tIH8dNEoeuZw/Hyy1T9TxVkF5KwHWpHtT+LkUsk/8k+xLc9fS3zr9jYivMiE/OR6q9+NaEYXWE1nRYDUXCZrdq9J7QS77MYPnVJDGGP/u2qM1ntcd6GU4uKfhJjXoJLy47YEPNcB5VSHmxG4dt2fe/TGd7e4ZynyiFM/HrQo=
Received: from AM6PR01MB4181.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com (20.177.39.82) by AM6PR01MB5237.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com (20.178.92.206) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2347.18; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 13:28:59 +0000
Received: from AM6PR01MB4181.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com ([fe80::8db2:deb6:c890:8eaf]) by AM6PR01MB4181.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com ([fe80::8db2:deb6:c890:8eaf%6]) with mapi id 15.20.2347.023; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 13:28:59 +0000
From: Carlo Caini <carlo.caini@unibo.it>
To: Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>, DTN WG <dtn@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [dtn] on obsoleting RFC5050
Thread-Index: AQHVhO7VbkRIu+vqwkevA48eFBAhpw==
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 13:28:59 +0000
Message-ID: <AM6PR01MB418169599755CA6344DA2705876D0@AM6PR01MB4181.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com>
References: <EC1EF7CB-3637-4DF4-A2CA-47902B4E3519@viagenie.ca>
In-Reply-To: <EC1EF7CB-3637-4DF4-A2CA-47902B4E3519@viagenie.ca>
Accept-Language: it-IT, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-clientproxiedby: MRXP264CA0035.FRAP264.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10a6:500:14::23) To AM6PR01MB4181.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10a6:20b:1d::18)
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=carlo.caini@unibo.it;
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
x-originating-ip: [137.204.143.180]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: b87fe5a8-fe0c-45cc-357e-08d75305f7c4
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: AM6PR01MB5237:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <AM6PR01MB5237A8E71EF2D4E96945EEE8876D0@AM6PR01MB5237.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-forefront-prvs: 01930B2BA8
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(4636009)(396003)(39860400002)(376002)(346002)(366004)(136003)(199004)(189003)(6246003)(66946007)(76176011)(6436002)(66476007)(64756008)(66446008)(26005)(102836004)(3846002)(6116002)(66556008)(50226002)(2906002)(81166006)(81156014)(8676002)(386003)(8936002)(186003)(6506007)(71200400001)(71190400001)(52536014)(99286004)(316002)(786003)(33656002)(110136005)(25786009)(5660300002)(9686003)(14444005)(86362001)(6306002)(256004)(44832011)(486006)(7696005)(52116002)(11346002)(55016002)(14454004)(7736002)(305945005)(74316002)(478600001)(561944003)(4720700003)(446003)(229853002)(476003)(66066001)(90706001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:AM6PR01MB5237; H:AM6PR01MB4181.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: unibo.it does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 4fvNG+8pYHyWfMl0YTAL7H8YJ7QhtQbZcAg1syrrqGDQ3WxT51nSkVHhccO1qK6Pp8NZ6DWAcY88eZ1ZEgoTv54mu4vkDaN+t4S1yY7VoNlepMAaUX1INEHiSQPW4xb0Tfx5D32nk9Q0ukDxc6xoArkR5hU6yNnx7nvXfjynbK2J3IblNdTmXW/GLCpmxcUJwVYRvM08Z45izPa/b4BrYs+q4AuGmx6IES9eROoKpLeKtEJDRitpXA4ARIwDLWwE0co8DFgrsfIA26MT7WI4tX/Jr9VuiLcSrUTbFHMBXVFoWNjzUvsZsiLGMrxJ6b0mpzKcBgrIMW0j72394svvR8uiPglwjQ4ngF8QenxjtYb6J94uMlb0QJ6yZobbXuWeIOa4u5pluytzZEKNnaPDQoLXBxfWxXoZYv0qWnPAQDBPZAAZOttKkQ3/q2d+ciYoTt5gUZroTTa9C1II6bjk8w==
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-ID: <25BBFA71C435C04EB26E58FD67C5FF42@eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: unibo.it
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: b87fe5a8-fe0c-45cc-357e-08d75305f7c4
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 17 Oct 2019 13:28:59.4396 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: e99647dc-1b08-454a-bf8c-699181b389ab
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: W2aj9dzezwNNVWg1Dgig6plZFroyKc94tD3jqutXAgcg/958mLklWnKsbioiElmtYhXIk4M+7RtSm4A4ViKrRw==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM6PR01MB5237
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dtn/_wXoypHCv29ngNqe5-kjjLOljdE>
Subject: Re: [dtn] on obsoleting RFC5050
X-BeenThere: dtn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Delay Tolerant Networking \(DTN\) discussion list at the IETF." <dtn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dtn/>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 13:29:06 -0000

I am in favor to your proposal.
Yours,
    Carlo Caini

At 12:18 17/10/2019, Marc Blanchet wrote:

>Hello,
>based on the various inputs and good discussion 
>on the mailing list regarding obsoleting 
>RFC5050, the chairs have come to this 
>conclusion. Please state your support or not so we can move forward.
>
>Regards, Marc&Rick, co-chairs.
>    * RFC5050 is an experimental RFC, done in 
> IRTF, while draft-ietf-dtn-bpbis will be a 
> Standard track RFC, done in IETF. Different streams, different processes.
>    * we believe there is a strong consensus to 
> not continue working on RFC5050 and not try to 
> be backward compatible. RFC5050 implementations 
> and deployments can continue as they see fit.
>    * IANA registries have their own life, 
> whatever the stream or type of RFC they were 
> created from. They can always be updated by a new RFC.
>    * Given that, we suggest the following steps:
>        * 1) draft-ietf-dtn-bpbis would not 
> obsolete RFC5050. Instead we would notify IRTF 
> that draft-ietf-dtn-bpbis is an update of 
> RFC5050. IRTF will decide what they want to do, if anything, with RFC5050.
>        * 2) in the new version of the charter 
> that we are currently working on, we will state 
> clearly that there is no intent to work on or 
> make compatible work with RFC5050 and related RFCs
>        * 3) DTN working group document authors 
> will review the IANA registries as they are 
> today and request whatever modifications 
> needed, which may include changing the policies, the content, the rules, …
>_______________________________________________
>dtn mailing list
>dtn@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email