IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dtn] AMA Adoption

Jéferson Campos Nobre <jcnobre@inf.ufrgs.br> Thu, 03 August 2017 14:19 UTC

Return-Path: <jeferson.nobre@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF63C13244B for <dtn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Aug 2017 07:19:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.919
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.919 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.199, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iIqAAxtkeu-V for <dtn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Aug 2017 07:19:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-f181.google.com (mail-qt0-f181.google.com [209.85.216.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 461E8132449 for <dtn@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Aug 2017 07:19:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-f181.google.com with SMTP id a18so8414880qta.0 for <dtn@ietf.org>; Thu, 03 Aug 2017 07:19:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=hN/Xp0NsAl9XMnBB/rtCrEUQKQLvPZk+pAyMjBZT0mg=; b=PqeqAZYTCnNPHSraiGsu0AkR6MaDW44ZCc5lH0qEsBB0Qm77dYB1fldD7kBiGs3l3t 38pC+Xc83KGi49vTu5nxdG4Uhf+zRZKashTD2OkGtkV3uRWo+jjWjjqEXx5qPC4p02RY kV3zulP3gkwdGw3AhteqIcxlIlz592/bF8mLuZid1p9/sQoS5jvBsaj9n4GJ9XB6tAMv G+wbyqiCmX83eod9IuUhzU4Qxr3GORp9XlvS0+f9Q/VdRUBU9rw7MG8iA53OnL3vBmGj YUwhKKDclxlTPlauhYYzVNEYY0zsBGXhuNB3pLFl2gfJco7IbJtQm6+efAvvueD6tAUJ QfHw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5huLXkSRwHsVSAuHVcg7Ur7yFUjEVJS5QIjkm2jpfB7o46DjDVT gMj81KWT2mcU2fEwk+M61c8nvracrQ==
X-Received: by 10.237.63.45 with SMTP id p42mr2222675qtf.320.1501769982125; Thu, 03 Aug 2017 07:19:42 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1501170948326.65397@jhuapl.edu> <CABv6xLuEM=B9ph-QCU3etbGP2Sm1O+AJjOFkJiKC7z9usT4pEg@mail.gmail.com> <8F715EFD-491E-459C-87DF-CD7FBF5735B4@syzygyengineering.com> <CABv6xLuaCO2HXESnQ6rPLZAffX1LG4nOkcEaxSAPtsu85uL+yw@mail.gmail.com> <E509F408-B220-4561-90C6-ECEA8B312625@syzygyengineering.com>
In-Reply-To: <E509F408-B220-4561-90C6-ECEA8B312625@syzygyengineering.com>
From: Jéferson Campos Nobre <jcnobre@inf.ufrgs.br>
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2017 14:19:31 +0000
Message-ID: <CABv6xLtU+xmSQuTSaM6+sDCq+9kkuBX92P2OUQiwfyaWn+S23g@mail.gmail.com>
To: William Ivancic <ivancic@syzygyengineering.com>, "Birrane, Edward J." <Edward.Birrane@jhuapl.edu>, "dtn@ietf.org" <dtn@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1143ce0651aa2a0555da1238"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dtn/dQ3jIAFxdgvsT_hUQOgC2Ykyf9I>
Subject: Re: [dtn] AMA Adoption
X-BeenThere: dtn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Delay Tolerant Networking \(DTN\) discussion list at the IETF." <dtn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dtn/>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2017 14:19:46 -0000

Hi Will.
Despite several workshop on automated network management, I believe there
is space in NMRG for different approaches/lines. For example, an I-D on
modelling SDN environments was recently submitted and presented
(draft-wehmuth-nmrg-sdn-model-00).
About the name, I agree that it is better to remove the association with
DTN. I think we could use something like "Asynchronous Management
Requirements" to embrace the  "Store, Carry and Forward" concept.
I would like to use your XML as a starting point, please. If someone wants
to join me in the reboot, just ping me.
Thanks
Best.
Jéferson

Em qua, 2 de ago de 2017 às 18:52, William Ivancic <
ivancic@syzygyengineering.com> escreveu:

> Looking at the DTN Network Management document of about 2009, I don’t
> think it fits with the Network Management Research Group’s current
> activities which appear to be more along the automated network management
> lines.
>
>
>
>
> https://trac.ietf.org/trac/irtf/wiki/NetworkManagementResearchGroupAg&LgChicago2017
>
>
>
> If I were to reboot the draft in the IRTF NMGR, I think I would rename the
> problem space as Store, Carry and Forward to remove unnecessary association
> with DTN.
>
>
>
> Regarding resurrecting in DTN, I don’t perceive there to be enough energy
> in this group to make it worthwhile.
>
>
>
> I have the xml files if someone wants them.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Will
>
>
>
> *From: *Jéferson Campos Nobre <jcnobre@inf.ufrgs.br>
> *Date: *Sunday, July 30, 2017 at 1:35 PM
> *To: *William Ivancic <ivancic@syzygyengineering.com>, Jéferson Campos
> Nobre <jcnobre@inf.ufrgs.br>, "Birrane, Edward J." <
> Edward.Birrane@jhuapl.edu>, "dtn@ietf.org" <dtn@ietf.org>
>
>
> *Subject: *Re: [dtn] AMA Adoption
>
>
>
> Hi Will.
>
> Do you have plans for the DTN Management Requirements I-D? What do you
> think of rebooting it on the NMRG?
>
> Cheers.
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Prof. Dr. Jéferson Campos Nobre
>
> Escola Politécnica
>
> Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos
>
> http://professor.unisinos.br/jcnobre
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dtn mailing list
> dtn@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email