[dtn] bpbis: maximum hop limit
"Marc Blanchet" <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca> Fri, 26 July 2019 16:52 UTC
Return-Path: <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B04EA120393 for <dtn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Jul 2019 09:52:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.4
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=1.5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=viagenie-ca.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c4M_F7mOf5XB for <dtn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Jul 2019 09:52:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2b.google.com (mail-io1-xd2b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 184581203AC for <dtn@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Jul 2019 09:52:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2b.google.com with SMTP id j6so30978262ioa.5 for <dtn@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Jul 2019 09:52:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=viagenie-ca.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=bOwoO5dhyuPyUATCSeFHPLyY6rh8HoVZC4M820g+NQ0=; b=t9B49RckUgCXWsnkLHPstvYpwhdX9C/LIIYK/N7gJUcCDrRijuqUEI4MoGcFo7bLWQ BDsAyVFSYeq1uvGlLx+Thl0EnP/VAUDyrgjfplEC+oPQ8XO5z9WflHfoD9tDUgJGDL70 nQL5mhaW2BeE3nlgjzdhzxpyRU4ta86mwpRhz5ryaIBtg2rbmqTz/0CYZm152+oWOpRN MbTDuN6w+WGobtx3WylWaL4hOu4imHc1js0P8sWsCHQ5Aem5UAsSz/bMrCC8Ny7BKrs8 HDbNcpJEDDbdwGjAgPGGtLwkDWz/3ZIm/u5Gnx68PGjnNoSja6Rn4TDWVdkpQH9ZLqF3 hMHQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=bOwoO5dhyuPyUATCSeFHPLyY6rh8HoVZC4M820g+NQ0=; b=q812yAEr+GvMBnjijkUCO88eres/ryC2IT2qRu4ApIdTiB6jxHdUIXG52Lu/AZaBhl IqvFFXUmvF7BSEZwp2PX1Y/wvBvsZiLcAz1xLS0jmlltw/e62jGYa16xPVw+fqWQXdZR nLoo+8QgSIIMZI4SyiGxBnGTGWSh4935Sl1WYWYlY+wsKqERwSWysocNQzPmXobmciuV u3/E+wlCn0v199qndov6R3ivzxgYxuZVlIxnu91piRx+hf2lxmZscSs63S7CqwD3b34l +cIgIvNog2ZJfJ5mmuRxRBgWrrf+kOgNyhhT0mLVPhvTpi+F9eOYsq62Q26ksEarkI/V 8K5w==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWcWqHshNyXjdAhIdFkBLOLwgfspwd+qB8jvgbyqjOYnNFvLFo6 qc1kGWeRT55lFD88sVBzi2tYe6mZKDOMJQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzwPW62spG/WiAdLkgxdqKfNwfXrML0+dl7S9DZMzAkpilOvTrZB6ohJTmp1lQhRTa54oHslg==
X-Received: by 2002:a02:7121:: with SMTP id n33mr95745004jac.19.1564159933981; Fri, 26 Jul 2019 09:52:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [206.123.31.194] ([75.98.19.132]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b14sm57548163iod.33.2019.07.26.09.52.07 for <dtn@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 26 Jul 2019 09:52:13 -0700 (PDT)
From: Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
To: DTN WG <dtn@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 12:51:33 -0400
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.12.5r5635)
Message-ID: <21C38E72-57DC-41B0-8FD3-0E82992DAD3D@viagenie.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; markup="markdown"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dtn/maJ2qNhm90j6HEaXZ7smobGWB38>
Subject: [dtn] bpbis: maximum hop limit
X-BeenThere: dtn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Delay Tolerant Networking \(DTN\) discussion list at the IETF." <dtn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dtn/>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 16:52:23 -0000
Hello, from our AD review of BPBis, there was a question on should there be a maximum hop limit, and if yes, what value should it be. There was some discussion today during the meeting, and it went towards specifying a maximum hop limit in BPbis, but there was almost no discussion on the possible value. So please provide your input here by replying to the list. ======= Should there be a maximum hop limit in BPbis? (expected answer: yes or no) If yes, what value should it be? (expected answer: an unsigned integer value) Rationale for your answers? ========= Thanks, Marc, co-chair.
- [dtn] bpbis: maximum hop limit Marc Blanchet
- Re: [dtn] [EXTERNAL] bpbis: maximum hop limit Burleigh, Scott C (US 312B)