IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dtn] Alert-Verify-Sender: Re: [EXT] Re: Status of AUTH48 Documents (and a request)

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Mon, 13 December 2021 07:44 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19BC43A0E67 for <dtn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Dec 2021 23:44:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l1HUHqBmPclc for <dtn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Dec 2021 23:44:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:32::15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 719293A0E70 for <dtn@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Dec 2021 23:44:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from client-0191.vpn.uni-bremen.de (client-0191.vpn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.107.191]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4JCD6z756dzDCvd; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 08:44:43 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <OF9D1F352D.F51CB910-ONC12587AA.00294D29-C12587AA.002A274C@esa.int>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 08:44:42 +0100
Cc: "Sipos, Brian J." <Brian.Sipos@jhuapl.edu>, "Birrane, Edward J." <Edward.Birrane@jhuapl.edu>, "dtn@ietf.org" <dtn@ietf.org>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 661074282.886595-c875fffcf5111c9765ad57de357bf47c
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2667CB03-AED4-4F4D-820B-25A7A2ABC4E5@tzi.org>
References: <1f59a748039f4b0e814875bd131c3be3@jhuapl.edu> <EBEF0B1E-DE44-4C2E-B782-79B57070F28D@tzi.org> <918aa73df59e4d5797d312ee46930567@jhuapl.edu> <13f0da3905b444cebf09f07e6e9b3972@jhuapl.edu> <OF9D1F352D.F51CB910-ONC12587AA.00294D29-C12587AA.002A274C@esa.int>
To: Felix.Flentge@esa.int
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dtn/owZPnqSL2CeastquvJT_MaN6VaM>
Subject: Re: [dtn] Alert-Verify-Sender: Re: [EXT] Re: Status of AUTH48 Documents (and a request)
X-BeenThere: dtn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Delay Tolerant Networking \(DTN\) discussion list at the IETF." <dtn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dtn/>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 07:44:53 -0000

On 2021-12-13, at 08:40, Felix.Flentge@esa.int wrote:
> 
> (Maybe even 'allowed' it to weak in this case and could be replaced by 'mandatory'.) 

Maybe not with that wording, but…
Is there a reason for allowing both definite and indefinite length at that level?

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email