Re: [dtn] [Acme] WGLC for ACME DTN Node ID

"Burleigh, Scott C (US 312B)" <scott.c.burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov> Mon, 07 June 2021 15:47 UTC

Return-Path: <scott.c.burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov>
X-Original-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 811853A1B1A for <dtn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 08:47:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.698, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FROM_GOV_DKIM_AU=-0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_SBL=0.5, URIBL_SBL_A=0.1] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=jpl.nasa.gov
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M5txQ3P0qH55 for <dtn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 08:47:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0e-0020b901.pphosted.com (mx0e-0020b901.pphosted.com [67.231.147.103]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F3983A1B0D for <dtn@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 08:47:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0196083.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0e-0020b901.pphosted.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 157FeZSK020392; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 15:47:08 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jpl.nasa.gov; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=InSight1906; bh=y7mjbZibKjm3ZaEmHqMllTdkPZUDUR7z3et/lt6WhM8=; b=v6aSfBRfctmw96RfB3Hq8l8cTLuaRkuMlDE5nxGRhPVrJpbv4RM7pLpcu0lLBq3v5gwR GeO9kPCRjgE0dGZA1atX2zWCk/OhzmF4Q9dTDTBpsE5r4AbIQXz7hGTANhDMpXl3CSMd fRu2kHhyDAszD12JZ/gqDDd2EVfaP0zFG3dh78hcCx93dHc+owSP8CFaMCXIxoO8f8I8 ZhpgAu8Ijw2Kbn5XmRZEklsTfDuyNiHF0WbEY0OteDf/xPPBKXcd80uuLsNIi/CP50FG LLHK7dC1OQruUemixbkcznURuEYFgzno1ODZHG/Kqm170Z9VQMmUEScqnz3gTWDRtXmL TA==
Received: from mail.jpl.nasa.gov (smtp.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.137.103]) by mx0e-0020b901.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 391bnu9n6g-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 07 Jun 2021 15:47:07 +0000
Received: from ap-embx16-sp60.RES.AD.JPL (ap-embx16-sp60.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.137.141]) by smtp.jpl.nasa.gov (Sentrion-MTA-4.5.4/Sentrion-MTA-4.5.4) with ESMTPS id 157FlIge136772 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128 bits) verified FAIL); Mon, 7 Jun 2021 15:47:19 GMT
Received: from ap-embx16-sp10.RES.AD.JPL (2002:8095:8953::8095:8953) by ap-embx16-sp60.RES.AD.JPL (2002:8095:898d::8095:898d) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2176.14; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 08:47:06 -0700
Received: from ap-embx16-sp10.RES.AD.JPL ([fe80::4:f430:47b5:767b]) by ap-embx16-sp10.RES.AD.JPL ([fe80::4:f430:47b5:767b%17]) with mapi id 15.01.2176.014; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 08:47:06 -0700
From: "Burleigh, Scott C (US 312B)" <scott.c.burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov>
To: Brian Sipos <BSipos@rkf-eng.com>, "dtn@ietf.org" <dtn@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Acme] WGLC for ACME DTN Node ID
Thread-Index: AQHXLT5BfSNCozHHr0WDM1PTxsWmz6qw8xdwgEeRm6CAEIe9MA==
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2021 15:47:06 +0000
Message-ID: <58b31926b00b4bcdb290544f59462d39@jpl.nasa.gov>
References: <MN2PR13MB356786C244606E57E23EC3039F739@MN2PR13MB3567.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>, <DM6PR13MB3562154A007745F3F22C45909F709@DM6PR13MB3562.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <MN2PR13MB35676BCD8EF92BD49867EACD9F229@MN2PR13MB3567.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR13MB35676BCD8EF92BD49867EACD9F229@MN2PR13MB3567.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [207.151.104.72]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_58b31926b00b4bcdb290544f59462d39jplnasagov_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Source-IP: ap-embx16-sp60.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.137.141]
X-Source-Sender: scott.c.burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov
X-AUTH: Authorized
X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: UWCIVHXjSI-zKDPGfqT7ziLKBMrNo9em
X-Proofpoint-GUID: UWCIVHXjSI-zKDPGfqT7ziLKBMrNo9em
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.391, 18.0.761 definitions=2021-06-07_11:2021-06-04, 2021-06-07 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxlogscore=921 adultscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2104190000 definitions=main-2106070112
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dtn/s7Dtk-Nw5ypueV-JNY7gooAlnsw>
Subject: Re: [dtn] [Acme] WGLC for ACME DTN Node ID
X-BeenThere: dtn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Delay Tolerant Networking \(DTN\) discussion list at the IETF." <dtn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dtn/>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2021 15:47:15 -0000

Good catch, Brian.  Just to clarify in my mind: are you proposing that IANA Considerations section of the BPv7 specification should be updated, or are you proposing that the new language in the ACME document would be sufficient to establish the mechanism for allocating new BPv7 administrative record types?  If the latter would pass muster with IESG then I am certainly for it.

Scott

From: dtn <dtn-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Brian Sipos
Sent: Monday, May 31, 2021 8:08 AM
To: dtn@ietf.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [dtn] [Acme] WGLC for ACME DTN Node ID

All,
The ACME validation draft is progressing to the point of IESG review, and one remaining known issue is the mechanism of allocating new BPv7 administrative record types. The BPbis document does not reference the pre-existing IANA registry the same way it does for block types and flags. This is not an ACME-related issue but would apply to any other new administrative record type allocation (e.g., BIBE).

I have added text to pre-submission ACME document [1] in Section 6 requirements and Section 9.3 IANA considerations: updating BPbis to use the IANA registry explicitly and for the registry to indicate BP version for each allocation.
This update also allocates values ">= 65536" as Reserved for Private or Experimental Use; similar to how other registries have high-value allocations for P/E use. This change would have no effect on BPv6 as the type codes for v6 are limited to 4-bit values.

Any objections to the ACME document to including this text or to reserve admin. record types for P/E use? It could just as well go into a separate document, since BPbis is already in the editor queue, but that would require a whole other review process for this small update.

[1] https://briansipos.github.io/acme-dtnnodeid/draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid.html<https://urldefense.us/v3/__https:/briansipos.github.io/acme-dtnnodeid/draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid.html__;!!PvBDto6Hs4WbVuu7!caqfTIZ1vzi2GY3Ov0ZNYjErjaGPW2Jj6s6W0G-rCaIflgtV2lKfvyoKqOQ6CdtW5FNsXU1BFvQ$>