Re: [Dyncast] How to expose "Computing Capability"?

[Jens Finkhaeuser <[e-mail]>]

Hi all,
maybe a tad off-topic, but I still think that "compute capability" is best application defined, and CAN should just offer a function for publishing an application specific value, where routers pick the best (aka highest/lowest; and/or maybe combine that with path awareness). That requires the least protocol engineering, the least computation on the router, and gives applications every flexibility in defining how to come by this value. Plus, it leaks the least amount of data one might not want to expose.


I say off-topic because I don't know what's in that paper!

Jens
------- Original Message -------
On Thursday, May 12th, 2022 at 09:00, Dirk Trossen <dirk.trossen=[e-mail]> wrote:


> Hi Linda,
> 

> Apologies for that. I had hoped the links are coming online quicker but they’re not yet there. I don’t want to send the PDF on the list directly but can provide it for anybody who drops me an email. Once I have the link, I’ll add it to the github issue.
> 

> Best,
> 

> Dirk
> 

> From: Dyncast [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Linda Dunbar
> Sent: 11 May 2022 20:33
> To: [e-mail]
> Subject: [Dyncast] How to expose "Computing Capability"?
> 

> The answer to the CAN issue #10 (Is computing resource measurable? https://github.com/CAN-IETF/CAN-BoF-ietf113/issues/10 ) states:
> 

> o   See IFIP Networking 2022 paper on how to simply expose “computing capability” and achieve better steering with such simple measure.
> 

> Does anyone have the link to the IFIP Network 2022 paper on how to simply expose “Computing Capability”?
> 

> Thank you
> 

> Linda