[e2md] On the issue of G-SPN's
"Richard Shockey" <richard@shockey.us> Mon, 24 May 2010 20:54 UTC
Return-Path: <richard@shockey.us>
X-Original-To: e2md@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: e2md@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABCFC3A6882 for <e2md@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 May 2010 13:54:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.389
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.389 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.725, BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P-Q+HbGB524X for <e2md@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 May 2010 13:54:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oproxy2-pub.bluehost.com (oproxy2-pub.bluehost.com [67.222.39.60]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 7EFE73A684E for <e2md@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 May 2010 13:54:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 21897 invoked by uid 0); 24 May 2010 20:47:51 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO box462.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.62) by oproxy2.bluehost.com with SMTP; 24 May 2010 20:47:51 -0000
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=shockey.us; h=Received:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Mailer:Thread-Index:Content-Language:X-Identified-User; b=YXL0F3tMoK4O8ALS/Ps33/++FRSNJQLogWqWXd0hyzIiwGQ+W2aya9fyU/TrgsCveF40Tg4UiG0fAjOtYlThC0zAR7z+5BlXd81rifW8SNpbT9X+EFYKgGalv/0hhLR3;
Received: from pool-96-231-199-72.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([96.231.199.72] helo=RSHOCKEYPC) by box462.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <richard@shockey.us>) id 1OGeYx-0001bX-4q; Mon, 24 May 2010 14:47:51 -0600
From: Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>
To: "'E.164 To MetaData BOF discussion list'" <e2md@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 16:47:43 -0400
Message-ID: <00dc01cafb82$5c85e700$1591b500$@us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00DD_01CAFB60.D5744700"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: Acr7glu2pEX3hlx4SJmiAT9DU/trww==
Content-Language: en-us
X-Identified-User: {3286:box462.bluehost.com:shockeyu:shockey.us} {sentby:smtp auth 96.231.199.72 authed with richard@shockey.us}
Cc: drinks@ietf.org, 'IETF ENUM list' <enum@ietf.org>, speermint@ietf.org
Subject: [e2md] On the issue of G-SPN's
X-BeenThere: e2md@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "E.164 To MetaData \(E2MD\) BOF discussion list" <e2md.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/e2md>, <mailto:e2md-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/e2md>
List-Post: <mailto:e2md@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:e2md-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/e2md>, <mailto:e2md-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 20:54:42 -0000
Though the use case for a G-SPN has been identified by this list and is on the TWKI, I want to make it abundantly clear that I do not believe that ENUM or a E2MD WG should actually define what is the appropriate namespace for G-SPN's. It is a requirement for DRINKS ( by ITU liaison) and touches on SPEERMINT ( which IMHO should shut down ). Consequently the logical thing to do is a individual submission. I've offered to try and rough cut a Use Case and Requirements document, which I will do in the not to distant future in collaboration with several others who have offered to help. Richard Shockey Shockey Consulting Chairman of the Board of Directors SIP Forum PSTN Mobile: +1 703.593.2683 < <mailto:richard(at)shockey.us> mailto:richard(at)shockey.us> skype: rshockey101 LinkedIn : <http://www.linkedin.com/in/rshockey101> http://www.linkedin.com/in/rshockey101 http//www.sipforum.org
- [e2md] On the issue of G-SPN's Richard Shockey
- Re: [e2md] On the issue of G-SPN's Tony Rutkowski
- Re: [e2md] On the issue of G-SPN's Richard Shockey
- Re: [e2md] On the issue of G-SPN's Tony Rutkowski