Re: [e2md] 4th e2md conference call, 29 June 2010, 17:00 UT

Thursday and 29 June are mutually exclusive according to my calendar.  
Which did you have in mind?

On Jun 24, 2010, at 2:33 PM, Bernie Hoeneisen wrote:

> Dear e2md:ers,
>
> Please find the details of the 4th e2md conference call below:
>
>
> * Date/Time:
>
>  Thursday, 29 June 2010, 17:00 UT (18:00 BST, 19:00 CEST, 13:00 EDT)
>  Duration: 60 min
>
>
> * Dial-In:
>
>  - SIP:   sip:60@mcu-hd.switch.ch --> Conference ID: 60 #
>  - H.323: h323:60@mcu-hd.switch.ch --> Conference ID: 60 #
>  - PSTN:  +41 44 250 96 60
>
>
> * Collaboration Tool:
>
>  http://collab.switch.ch/ietf-e2md
>  (as usual we will use this during the call)
>
>
> * Goal
>
>  Preparation E2MD (ENUM WG) session for Maastricht, and
>  decide on who does what by when.
>
>
> * Agenda (draft):
>
>  1) Welcome / Roll-Call / Scribe
>
>  2) Gathering Input for making a charter proposal
>
>     Background:
>
>     - We decided to go for the following approach:
>       - Narrow down the problem space to E2MD services for:
>         - g-spid, cnam, service capabilities, (unused, and send-n)
>       - For each E2MD service
>         - document the requirements, and
>         - develop an individual solution as PS
>       - Longer term requirements are out-of-scope for this approach
>
>     - See also:
>       http://trac.tools.ietf.org/bof/e2md/trac/wiki
>
>
>   3) Decide how does what by when
>
>      Deadlines: http://www.ietf.org/meeting/cutoff-dates-2010.html#IETF78
>
>      a) Write I-Ds on the E2MD services containing a concise
>         problem statement, requirments use cases, etc.
>         (avoid a particular solution at this point in time,
>         as any solution almost certainly triggers nasty objections.)
>
>         - g-spid (Penn)
>         - cnam (Rich?)
>         - service capabilities (...?)
>         - unused (Lawrence?)
>         - send-n (Ray?)
>
>      b) Work out charter proposal to be discussed in Maastricht  
> (Dave?)
>
>      Note: 3a) is a precondition for 3b)
>
>
>   4) AOB
>
>
>
> Note: The discussion was rather fuzzy in some recent conf calls.
>      If during this call there is a need to structure the discussion
>      and give also the less "dominant" participants  a chance to  
> speak,
>      we will use the collaboration tool to maintain a speakers list,
>      which has a built-in "Raise hand" function.
>
>
> cheers,
> Bernie
>
> --
>
> http://ucom.ch/
> Tech Consulting for Internet Standardization
>
> _______________________________________________
> e2md mailing list
> e2md@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/e2md
>