Re: [e2md] On the issue of G-SPN's
Tony Rutkowski <trutkowski@netmagic.com> Mon, 24 May 2010 21:07 UTC
Return-Path: <trutkowski@netmagic.com>
X-Original-To: e2md@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: e2md@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 144F03A6D10; Mon, 24 May 2010 14:07:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.453
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.453 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.454, BAYES_50=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WLbd-gLcLxEb; Mon, 24 May 2010 14:07:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vms173013pub.verizon.net (vms173013pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.13]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D2BB3A6D01; Mon, 24 May 2010 14:07:57 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Content-type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Received: from [192.168.0.20] ([unknown] [173.71.223.14]) by vms173013.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0L2Y00JXY00AT1D0@vms173013.mailsrvcs.net>; Mon, 24 May 2010 16:07:27 -0500 (CDT)
Message-id: <4BFAEA8A.4010005@netmagic.com>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 17:07:22 -0400
From: Tony Rutkowski <trutkowski@netmagic.com>
Organization: Netmagic Associates
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100406 Shredder/3.0.4
To: Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>
References: <00dc01cafb82$5c85e700$1591b500$@us>
In-reply-to: <00dc01cafb82$5c85e700$1591b500$@us>
Cc: drinks@ietf.org, 'IETF ENUM list' <enum@ietf.org>, "'E.164 To MetaData BOF discussion list'" <e2md@ietf.org>, speermint@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [e2md] On the issue of G-SPN's
X-BeenThere: e2md@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: trutkowski@netmagic.com
List-Id: "E.164 To MetaData \(E2MD\) BOF discussion list" <e2md.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/e2md>, <mailto:e2md-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/e2md>
List-Post: <mailto:e2md@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:e2md-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/e2md>, <mailto:e2md-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 21:07:58 -0000
Hi Richard, Could you amplify on the "by ITU liaision" parenthetical? Considering the G-SPN notion is being driven by a NeuStar input into ITU-T, that creates a substantial NeuStar new revenue opportunity/impact on providers, chaired by a NeuStar staff member in ITU-T, and sprinkled with NeuStar people in IETF, some care seems appropriate about the assertions and process. I'll offer to help as well. cheers, tony On 5/24/2010 4:47 PM, Richard Shockey wrote: > > Though the use case for a G-SPN has been identified by this list and > is on the TWKI, I want to make it abundantly clear that I do not > believe that ENUM or a E2MD WG should actually define what is the > appropriate namespace for G-SPN’s. > > It is a requirement for DRINKS ( by ITU liaison) and touches on > SPEERMINT ( which IMHO should shut down ). Consequently the logical > thing to do is a individual submission. > > I’ve offered to try and rough cut a Use Case and Requirements > document, which I will do in the not to distant future in > collaboration with several others who have offered to help. >
- [e2md] On the issue of G-SPN's Richard Shockey
- Re: [e2md] On the issue of G-SPN's Tony Rutkowski
- Re: [e2md] On the issue of G-SPN's Richard Shockey
- Re: [e2md] On the issue of G-SPN's Tony Rutkowski