Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Discussions

It is deficient because it does not take into account the impacts that
will occur to the various access technologies.  All access technologies
do not have the same capacity, bandwidth, etc. Therefore any design that
has the potential to send information to all citizens within an area via
any variety of access technologies needs to consider these factors.  For
example, consider the scenario of trying to send an alert to the 100,000
fans at a college football game.

The current draft charter of ATOCA does not address this which is why
the additional sentences for the second paragraph were proposed. 

DeWayne

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Barnes [mailto:rbarnes@bbn.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 1:38 PM
To: SENNETT, DEWAYNE A (ATTCINW)
Cc: DALY, BRIAN K (ATTCINW); Henning Schulzrinne; DOLLY, MARTIN C
(ATTLABS); earlywarning@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Discussions

Could you please clarify how you believe it to be deficient?

On Apr 7, 2010, at 4:37 PM, SENNETT, DEWAYNE A (ATTCINW) wrote:

> My "personal" view is that the charter as currently written is not
> correct or adequate.
>
> DeWayne
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: earlywarning-bounces@ietf.org
> [mailto:earlywarning-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of DALY, BRIAN K
> (ATTCINW)
> Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 1:33 PM
> To: Henning Schulzrinne; DOLLY, MARTIN C (ATTLABS)
> Cc: earlywarning@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Discussions
>
> Fine but my "personal" view does not change.
>
> Brian Daly
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henning Schulzrinne [mailto:hgs@cs.columbia.edu]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 1:31 PM
> To: DOLLY, MARTIN C (ATTLABS)
> Cc: DALY, BRIAN K (ATTCINW); earlywarning@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Discussions
>
> The point is that people speak as individuals in the IETF and there is
> no particular notion that a corporate opinion has any more weight than
> that of any individual. Thus, stating a corporate opinion is out of
> place and against IETF custom and convention.
>
>
> Henning
>
> On Apr 7, 2010, at 4:28 PM, DOLLY, MARTIN C (ATTLABS) wrote:
>
>> They sure do, look at everyone's badge
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: earlywarning-bounces@ietf.org <earlywarning-bounces@ietf.org>
>> To: DALY, BRIAN K (ATTCINW)
>> Cc: earlywarning@ietf.org <earlywarning@ietf.org>
>> Sent: Wed Apr 07 16:21:20 2010
>> Subject: Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Discussions
>>
>> I didn't know that the IETF had corporate opinions. But maybe the  
>> IETF
> rules have changed recently?
>>
>> Henning
>>
>> On Apr 7, 2010, at 4:13 PM, DALY, BRIAN K (ATTCINW) wrote:
>>
>>> For the record, AT&T is in opposition to removing the last sentence.
>>>
>>> Brian Daly
>>> AT&T
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> earlywarning mailing list
>> earlywarning@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning
>
> _______________________________________________
> earlywarning mailing list
> earlywarning@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning
> _______________________________________________
> earlywarning mailing list
> earlywarning@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning