Re: [earlywarning] WG Review: Authority to Citizen Alert (ATOCA)

Marc Linsner <mlinsner@cisco.com> Tue, 20 July 2010 22:15 UTC

Return-Path: <mlinsner@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: earlywarning@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: earlywarning@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 472573A6818; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 15:15:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FHuhkxRONCjE; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 15:15:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rtp-iport-1.cisco.com (rtp-iport-1.cisco.com [64.102.122.148]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F2483A67E7; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 15:15:46 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: rtp-iport-1.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAHe9RUxAZnwN/2dsb2JhbACfdnGmT5sNhTIEiFk
Received: from rtp-core-2.cisco.com ([64.102.124.13]) by rtp-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 20 Jul 2010 22:16:01 +0000
Received: from [10.116.195.117] (rtp-mlinsner-8714.cisco.com [10.116.195.117]) by rtp-core-2.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o6KMG1W1020389; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 22:16:01 GMT
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.25.0.100505
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 18:16:00 -0400
From: Marc Linsner <mlinsner@cisco.com>
To: ken carlberg <carlberg@g11.org.uk>, <iesg@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <C86B9860.26B59%mlinsner@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [earlywarning] WG Review: Authority to Citizen Alert (ATOCA)
Thread-Index: AcsoWSIh418F9+OlAki8+c6Y64w/xg==
In-Reply-To: <C8074EAF-8B10-46D9-A2B7-9BBB3461CF71@g11.org.uk>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Cc: earlywarning@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [earlywarning] WG Review: Authority to Citizen Alert (ATOCA)
X-BeenThere: earlywarning@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for Authority-to-Individuals \(Early Warning\) Emergency " <earlywarning.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning>, <mailto:earlywarning-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/earlywarning>
List-Post: <mailto:earlywarning@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:earlywarning-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning>, <mailto:earlywarning-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 22:15:49 -0000

Ken,

Did you see Robert's email:

http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/earlywarning/current/msg00323.html

-Marc-


On 7/20/10 5:56 PM, "ken carlberg" <carlberg@g11.org.uk> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
>> A new IETF working group has been proposed in the Real-time Applications
>> and Infrastructure Area.  The IESG has not made any determination as yet.
>> The following draft charter was submitted, and is provided for
>> informational purposes only. Please send your comments to the IESG mailing
>> list (iesg@ietf.org) by Tuesday, July 27, 2010.
> 
> given the wording of the above, the proposed working group was at least
> discussed internally within the IESG.  Would it be possible to get a summary
> of the issues/concerns expressed by the IESG?  It would be helpful to have a
> perspective to focus comments from the masses, and avoid the generic and
> uninformative "I support this effort becoming a working group" statement
> 
> kindest regards,
> 
> -ken
> 
> _______________________________________________
> earlywarning mailing list
> earlywarning@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning