Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Discussions

"DALY, BRIAN K (ATTCINW)" <BD2985@att.com> Wed, 07 April 2010 20:06 UTC

Return-Path: <BD2985@att.com>
X-Original-To: earlywarning@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: earlywarning@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A04DE3A659A for <earlywarning@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 13:06:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L8-ATcpn2nby for <earlywarning@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 13:06:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail121.messagelabs.com (mail121.messagelabs.com [216.82.242.3]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 642793A67A1 for <earlywarning@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 13:06:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-Env-Sender: BD2985@att.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-14.tower-121.messagelabs.com!1270670810!33807888!1
X-StarScan-Version: 6.2.4; banners=-,-,-
X-Originating-IP: [144.160.112.25]
Received: (qmail 29608 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2010 20:06:51 -0000
Received: from sbcsmtp3.sbc.com (HELO tlph064.enaf.dadc.sbc.com) (144.160.112.25) by server-14.tower-121.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 7 Apr 2010 20:06:51 -0000
Received: from enaf.dadc.sbc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by tlph064.enaf.dadc.sbc.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o37K6oHk003579; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 15:06:50 -0500
Received: from td03xsmtp006.US.Cingular.Net (td03xspare19-new.us.cingular.net [135.179.64.43] (may be forged)) by tlph064.enaf.dadc.sbc.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o37K6g4C003408; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 15:06:42 -0500
Received: from BD01XSMTP003.US.Cingular.Net ([135.163.18.44]) by td03xsmtp006.US.Cingular.Net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 7 Apr 2010 15:06:42 -0500
Received: from BD01MSXMB016.US.Cingular.Net ([135.214.27.50]) by BD01XSMTP003.US.Cingular.Net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 7 Apr 2010 13:06:40 -0700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 13:06:39 -0700
Message-ID: <FDFC6E6B2064844FBEB9045DF1E3FBBC4F8133@BD01MSXMB016.US.Cingular.Net>
In-Reply-To: <C7E25C84.2C971%br@brianrosen.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Discussions
thread-index: AcrWjOnQzIrOmfkWpkW9AHUa9LM3sQAADURQ
References: <C99FF8B7-61F4-4A05-8389-4F90E43F12F4@g11.org.uk> <C7E25C84.2C971%br@brianrosen.net>
From: "DALY, BRIAN K (ATTCINW)" <BD2985@att.com>
To: "Brian Rosen" <br@brianrosen.net>, "ken carlberg" <carlberg@g11.org.uk>, "SENNETT, DEWAYNE A (ATTCINW)" <DS2225@att.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Apr 2010 20:06:40.0820 (UTC) FILETIME=[D6566740:01CAD68D]
Cc: Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>, earlywarning@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Discussions
X-BeenThere: earlywarning@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for Authority-to-Individuals \(Early Warning\) Emergency " <earlywarning.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning>, <mailto:earlywarning-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/earlywarning>
List-Post: <mailto:earlywarning@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:earlywarning-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning>, <mailto:earlywarning-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 20:06:56 -0000

Absolutely false!!

You have no clue what the incoming emergency call is about - it could be
a kitty in the tree call, as you put it, or it could be "I just had a
heart attack and need help immediately".

An authority to citizen "call" should never take priority over a citizen
to authority, and this is regulated ni the FCC rules for CMAS.

And your typhoon analogy proves the point - a typhoon is known several
days in advance, while you have minutes to take action on a heart
attack.

Brian Daly

-----Original Message-----
From: earlywarning-bounces@ietf.org
[mailto:earlywarning-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian Rosen
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 1:00 PM
To: ken carlberg; SENNETT, DEWAYNE A (ATTCINW)
Cc: Hannes Tschofenig; earlywarning@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Discussions

Generally, it's not a good idea for any service to impede any other
service,
but we don't have to say that all the time.  Here, I think we don't have
to
discuss how authority to citizen should be prioritized over citizen to
authority.  I rather suspect that an outgoing warning of an impending
typhoon is more important that an incoming kitty-in-the-tree call, but
maybe
that's just me.

ATOCA may or may not be a replacement for something that exists.  Agree
with
Ken, the market (and in this case, likely governments) will decide.

So I would not want to see this text in the charter.

Brian


On 4/7/10 3:48 PM, "ken carlberg" <carlberg@g11.org.uk> wrote:

> 
> On Apr 7, 2010, at 11:30 AM, SENNETT, DEWAYNE A (ATTCINW) wrote:
> 
>> "The ATOCA solutions will not adversely affect the ability of any
access
>> technology to provide emergency services to the citizens (e.g. 9-1-1
>> calls) or to provide communication services to first responders or
other
>> authorized emergency services personnel.  Additionally, ATOCA is not
>> replacement solution for any authority to citizen alerting supported
by
>> any access technology."
> 
> given the previous thread on this list, I'm a bit leery of that first
> sentence.  But, if it were agreed to add it in, then I would expect
the
> individuals who make a claim that an ATOCA solution adversely affects
9-1-1
> type calls will be required to prove it instead of simply stating a
position.
> 
> as for the second sentence, that is out of scope of the IETF.  any
deployment
> of what is considered an ATOCA solution is a market decision.
> 
> -ken
> 
> _______________________________________________
> earlywarning mailing list
> earlywarning@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning


_______________________________________________
earlywarning mailing list
earlywarning@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning