Re: [earlywarning] status?

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Thu, 01 July 2010 17:18 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: earlywarning@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: earlywarning@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDB993A6827 for <earlywarning@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 10:18:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.177
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.177 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.423, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JUnDmnN4kbym for <earlywarning@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 10:18:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB2413A67F9 for <earlywarning@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 10:18:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.105] (pool-173-71-46-100.dllstx.fios.verizon.net [173.71.46.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o61HIkTh014887 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 1 Jul 2010 12:18:46 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <EF1A111B-8447-4742-AB7C-22F41E901F9D@bbn.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 12:18:46 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <ED5C3A95-8483-4450-A4BD-A62AB8C96AE7@nostrum.com>
References: <4591CC46-2EB3-4C92-BFA3-FEF94C47DB28@g11.org.uk> <EF1A111B-8447-4742-AB7C-22F41E901F9D@bbn.com>
To: "Richard L. Barnes" <rbarnes@bbn.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
Received-SPF: pass (nostrum.com: 173.71.46.100 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 12:32:38 -0700
Cc: earlywarning@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [earlywarning] status?
X-BeenThere: earlywarning@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for Authority-to-Individuals \(Early Warning\) Emergency " <earlywarning.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning>, <mailto:earlywarning-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/earlywarning>
List-Post: <mailto:earlywarning@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:earlywarning-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning>, <mailto:earlywarning-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 17:18:44 -0000

I don't believe we need another BoF and am working on getting the working group chartered.
I am taking this to the IESG. Unless I encounter something unexpected, it will go out for external review before Maastricht.

RjS

On Jul 1, 2010, at 12:06 PM, Richard L. Barnes wrote:

> I think the charter has been submitted to the IESG, and is waiting on action from the ADs.
> 
> 
> On Jul 1, 2010, at 1:05 PM, ken carlberg wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> given the latest charter that was circulated around, does anyone know if there was an attempt for another BoF, or to establish a WG for this effort?
>> 
>> -ken
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> earlywarning mailing list
>> earlywarning@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning
> 
> _______________________________________________
> earlywarning mailing list
> earlywarning@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning