Re: [earlywarning] Comments on draft-schulzrinne-atoca-requirements-00

["Hannes Tschofenig" <[e-mail]>]

Hi Tony, 

When I look at the available sites that offer CAP alerts then I see email alike identifiers (rather than OIDs). 

I wonder whether using OID was a deployment friendly choice. 

Anyway, someone will have to figure out how these OIDs in the CAP alerts relate to signatures protecting CAP alerts. 

Still, this has nothing to do with the transport since the identity in the cert, the content of the sender element of the CAP alert, and the identity in the SIP messages (From field) are less like to all match...

Ciao
Hannes
 

>   On 7/20/2010 2:33 PM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
> >
> > Since the work in this group only focuses on the transport 
> > of alerts rather than the actual content of the alerts we 
> > should not be impacted.
> 
> Dear Hannes,
> 
> Probably...except note that the conceptualization of
> the early warning OID namespace includes tagging for
> all objects, including messages as well as organization
> entities.  There is also an ongoing discussion about
> the desirability of binding the identifiers to EVcerts.
> So components of this work could affect transport
> layers/protocols.
> 
> --tony