Re: [earlywarning] WG Review: Authority to Citizen Alert (ATOCA)

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Tue, 20 July 2010 22:35 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: earlywarning@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: earlywarning@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEFAA3A6824; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 15:35:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.487
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.487 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.113, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 06+v4cRLbK4G; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 15:35:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 449043A6809; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 15:35:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.105] (pool-173-71-46-100.dllstx.fios.verizon.net [173.71.46.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o6KMZrvx053029 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:35:53 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <13AFA561-2EA9-4DA1-8813-43905B68A68A@g11.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:35:52 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <473594F4-2959-4695-A398-58142A31EB12@nostrum.com>
References: <C86B9860.26B59%mlinsner@cisco.com> <13AFA561-2EA9-4DA1-8813-43905B68A68A@g11.org.uk>
To: ken carlberg <carlberg@g11.org.uk>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
Received-SPF: pass (nostrum.com: 173.71.46.100 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
Cc: earlywarning@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [earlywarning] WG Review: Authority to Citizen Alert (ATOCA)
X-BeenThere: earlywarning@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for Authority-to-Individuals \(Early Warning\) Emergency " <earlywarning.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning>, <mailto:earlywarning-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/earlywarning>
List-Post: <mailto:earlywarning@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:earlywarning-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning>, <mailto:earlywarning-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 22:35:44 -0000

Hi Ken -

Sorry if I introduced confusion - I indicated that the charter was approved for external review - the IETF as a whole
and any other bodies watching the new-work mailing list are asked to review and comment. The actual formation
of the group is still under consideration.

RjS

On Jul 20, 2010, at 5:25 PM, ken carlberg wrote:

> Hmmmm,  I thought that there were more concerns than that stated by Robert given the comment in the announcement stating "The IESG has not made any determination as yet", which seemed to run contrary to Robert's statement that "the ATOCA charter was approved".  
> 
> If I mis-read things, then I'll subscribe to those famous words of Rosana Rosana Dana....."never mind" :-)
> 
> cheers,
> 
> -ken
> 
> 
> On Jul 20, 2010, at 6:16 PM, Marc Linsner wrote:
> 
>> Ken,
>> 
>> Did you see Robert's email:
>> 
>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/earlywarning/current/msg00323.html
>> 
>> -Marc-
>> 
>> 
>> On 7/20/10 5:56 PM, "ken carlberg" <carlberg@g11.org.uk> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>>> A new IETF working group has been proposed in the Real-time Applications
>>>> and Infrastructure Area.  The IESG has not made any determination as yet.
>>>> The following draft charter was submitted, and is provided for
>>>> informational purposes only. Please send your comments to the IESG mailing
>>>> list (iesg@ietf.org) by Tuesday, July 27, 2010.
>>> 
>>> given the wording of the above, the proposed working group was at least
>>> discussed internally within the IESG.  Would it be possible to get a summary
>>> of the issues/concerns expressed by the IESG?  It would be helpful to have a
>>> perspective to focus comments from the masses, and avoid the generic and
>>> uninformative "I support this effort becoming a working group" statement
>>> 
>>> kindest regards,
>>> 
>>> -ken
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> earlywarning mailing list
>>> earlywarning@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning
>> 
>> 
>