[Atoca] Summary of "Language and Media Type" Discussion

Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> Sun, 27 February 2011 10:21 UTC

Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: earlywarning@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: earlywarning@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8B1D3A6844 for <earlywarning@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 02:21:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.645
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.645 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.046, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dkzyqpJTXyNH for <earlywarning@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 02:21:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 35ADB3A68EC for <earlywarning@ietf.org>; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 02:21:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 27 Feb 2011 10:22:17 -0000
Received: from a88-115-222-204.elisa-laajakaista.fi (EHLO [192.168.1.3]) [88.115.222.204] by mail.gmx.net (mp067) with SMTP; 27 Feb 2011 11:22:17 +0100
X-Authenticated: #29516787
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/R8QFJTEbRURToXvfxsjB38Q6hmYeOWZg0BIeSuq 1tcghqMV5letdS
From: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 12:22:13 +0200
Message-Id: <0D026F7A-8471-485B-B54E-8A0FEC293771@gmx.net>
To: earlywarning@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Subject: [Atoca] Summary of "Language and Media Type" Discussion
X-BeenThere: earlywarning@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for the IETF Authority-to-Citizen Alert \(atoca\) working group." <earlywarning.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning>, <mailto:earlywarning-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/earlywarning>
List-Post: <mailto:earlywarning@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:earlywarning-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning>, <mailto:earlywarning-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 10:21:22 -0000

Hi all, 

in the discussion around the language and media type your feedback focused on the language part; the media type aspect wasn't really touched. 

In any case, I again think we need to differentiate two aspects here: 

1) Policy

For certain types of alerts governments may decide in what languages are supported in alerts. In other cases the alert message author may make that decision. 

2) Technology 

It would be important to have some mechanism to actually allow the potential recipient to indicate what languages he or she prefers. Martin suggested a Accept-Language header concept and Richard refined it. 

The language tag in the CAP encoded alert, as raised by Art, would then indicate in what language the specific alert is using.

To address this issue in the document two modifications are needed: 
a) In http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-atoca-requirements-01 I believe it is useful to clarify that we are talking about (2) and that (1) may decide what is being used. 
b) In http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rosen-atoca-cap-01 the text Richard and Martin proposed would be added. 

Ciao
Hannes