Re: [earlywarning] WG Review: Authority to Citizen Alert (ATOCA)

The process is:

1. Internal IESG review

2. Send it out for external review

3. Final determination (based on external review)

We're at Step 2. :)

On 7/20/10 4:25 PM, ken carlberg wrote:
> Hmmmm,  I thought that there were more concerns than that stated by
> Robert given the comment in the announcement stating "The IESG has
> not made any determination as yet", which seemed to run contrary to
> Robert's statement that "the ATOCA charter was approved".
> 
> If I mis-read things, then I'll subscribe to those famous words of
> Rosana Rosana Dana....."never mind" :-)
> 
> cheers,
> 
> -ken
> 
> 
> On Jul 20, 2010, at 6:16 PM, Marc Linsner wrote:
> 
>> Ken,
>> 
>> Did you see Robert's email:
>> 
>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/earlywarning/current/msg00323.html
>>
>>
>> 
-Marc-
>> 
>> 
>> On 7/20/10 5:56 PM, "ken carlberg" <carlberg@g11.org.uk> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>>> A new IETF working group has been proposed in the Real-time
>>>> Applications and Infrastructure Area.  The IESG has not made
>>>> any determination as yet. The following draft charter was
>>>> submitted, and is provided for informational purposes only.
>>>> Please send your comments to the IESG mailing list
>>>> (iesg@ietf.org) by Tuesday, July 27, 2010.
>>> 
>>> given the wording of the above, the proposed working group was at
>>> least discussed internally within the IESG.  Would it be possible
>>> to get a summary of the issues/concerns expressed by the IESG?
>>> It would be helpful to have a perspective to focus comments from
>>> the masses, and avoid the generic and uninformative "I support
>>> this effort becoming a working group" statement
>>> 
>>> kindest regards,
>>> 
>>> -ken
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________ earlywarning
>>> mailing list earlywarning@ietf.org 
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning
>> 