Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Discussions
"MUSGROVE, CHARLES P (ATTCINW)" <CM8655@att.com> Fri, 09 April 2010 17:43 UTC
Return-Path: <CM8655@att.com>
X-Original-To: earlywarning@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: earlywarning@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D91E13A6810; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 10:43:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lNrM36xwr3fv; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 10:43:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail129.messagelabs.com (mail129.messagelabs.com [216.82.250.147]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10EA63A67AD; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 10:43:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-Env-Sender: CM8655@att.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-12.tower-129.messagelabs.com!1270834995!9427337!1
X-StarScan-Version: 6.2.4; banners=-,-,-
X-Originating-IP: [144.160.112.25]
Received: (qmail 32290 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2010 17:43:15 -0000
Received: from sbcsmtp3.sbc.com (HELO tlph064.enaf.dadc.sbc.com) (144.160.112.25) by server-12.tower-129.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 9 Apr 2010 17:43:15 -0000
Received: from enaf.dadc.sbc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by tlph064.enaf.dadc.sbc.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o39HhESv031672; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 12:43:15 -0500
Received: from td03xsmtp008.US.Cingular.Net (intexchapp01.us.cingular.net [135.179.64.42] (may be forged)) by tlph064.enaf.dadc.sbc.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o39Hh9cl031544; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 12:43:09 -0500
Received: from bd01xsmtp004.US.Cingular.Net ([135.163.18.45]) by td03xsmtp008.US.Cingular.Net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 9 Apr 2010 12:43:08 -0500
Received: from BD01MSXMB023.US.Cingular.Net ([135.163.18.69]) by bd01xsmtp004.US.Cingular.Net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 9 Apr 2010 10:43:07 -0700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2010 10:43:04 -0700
Message-ID: <C2C65F42AFB4B64090C92F28A6F6302E0E742023@BD01MSXMB023.US.Cingular.Net>
In-Reply-To: <49736.76.25.20.162.1270829364.squirrel@mail.opengeospatial.org>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Discussions
Thread-Index: AcrX/xIwlAsPTiGvQpa6ol5ZezWm6wADCpbA
References: <OFCA7503BE.2F496E41-ON852576FF.004864D7-852576FF.00492183@csc.com><C7E35393.2CB12%br@brianrosen.net><FDFC6E6B2064844FBEB9045DF1E3FBBC4F837D@BD01MSXMB016.US.Cingular.Net> <49736.76.25.20.162.1270829364.squirrel@mail.opengeospatial.org>
From: "MUSGROVE, CHARLES P (ATTCINW)" <CM8655@att.com>
To: creed@opengeospatial.org, "DALY, BRIAN K (ATTCINW)" <BD2985@att.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Apr 2010 17:43:07.0435 (UTC) FILETIME=[1D2FA7B0:01CAD80C]
Cc: earlywarning-bounces@ietf.org, earlywarning@ietf.org, "DOLLY, MARTIN C (ATTLABS)" <md3135@att.com>
Subject: Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Discussions
X-BeenThere: earlywarning@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for Authority-to-Individuals \(Early Warning\) Emergency " <earlywarning.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning>, <mailto:earlywarning-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/earlywarning>
List-Post: <mailto:earlywarning@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:earlywarning-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning>, <mailto:earlywarning-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2010 17:43:22 -0000
Europe is looking at a warning system based on the 3GPP Public Warning System (PWS) based on cell broadcast. They are studying the US-based CMAS as a model for their PWS with a long-term goal of supporting PWS for international roamers (among European countries as well as to/from US/Asia/elsewhere). The Netherlands is already moving toward implementation of a cell broadcast-based system. Regards, Peter Musgrove -----Original Message----- From: earlywarning-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:earlywarning-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of creed@opengeospatial.org Sent: Friday, April 09, 2010 9:09 AM To: DALY, BRIAN K (ATTCINW) Cc: DOLLY, MARTIN C (ATTLABS); earlywarning-bounces@ietf.org; earlywarning@ietf.org Subject: Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Discussions In Europe they are working toward a Pan-European alerting and warning infrastructure with full interoperability. However, I am not sure at what level in the "stack" this work is being done - perhaps more at the higher levels in the application arena. I do not see discussions on L2 or CMAS or whatever. The European programs are initially being funded as part of the FP 6 and 7 initiatives. Check out ORCHESTRA (http://www.eu-orchestra.org/), GMES/SAFER (http://www.emergencyresponse.eu/site/FO/scripts/myFO_accueil.php?lang=EN) and SANY (http://www.sany-ip.eu/). SANY is interesting because the focus is on integrating sensor alerts into a modeling, warning, and alerting infrastructure. Similar activities are occurring in Asia, such as Debris Flow Monitoring and Alerting in Taiwan, Tsunami Alerting in Indonesia, and earthquake warning in Japan. Regards Carl > Brian - > > If "no one" is asking for interoperability (and I am not sure who "no one" > is :-) ) then I agree this can be a somewhat peaceful co-existence of > mandated services (CMAS, EAS, iPAWS, DMOpen vs a market driven service > that is not and will not be designed with the intention to integrate into > or interoperate with services such as CMAS. > > However, because of the potential for confusion by the reader and > regulators, all we are asking is that the charter clearly state this fact > that apparently we are in agreement on. > > Can we craft some language for the charter that emphasizes this? > > Brian D. > > -----Original Message----- > From: earlywarning-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:earlywarning-bounces@ietf.org] > On Behalf Of Brian Rosen > Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 6:34 AM > To: Padma Valluri > Cc: earlywarning-bounces@ietf.org; SENNETT, DEWAYNE A (ATTCINW); > earlywarning@ietf.org; DOLLY, MARTIN C (ATTLABS) > Subject: Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Discussions > > Because it¹s pretty hard to define ³interoperability² with L2 mechanisms > that deliver alerts. One of the biggest problems I have with most > existing > L2 specific mechanisms is that they assume they are the only way alerts > are > received. As a result, if you get an alert from some other mechanism, you > have no idea if its the same alert or a different one. Your UI can't help > you at all with this. One of the things I think we need is some ID > mechanism which is protocol agnostic and simply serves as the way to know > if > you got an alert from multiple sources that they are the same alert. > > Actually, no one is asking for interoperability. They are discussing > various forms of peaceful co-existence. Designing the protocol to take > advantage of some kinds of L2 packet delivery mechanisms may be possible > however. > > Brian > > > On 4/8/10 9:18 AM, "Padma Valluri" <pvalluri@csc.com> wrote: > >> >> I'm not sure what "use" means here other than to imply >> interoperable/interworking with existing capabilities that are more >> efficient >> in certain segments of the network and deployed already. Why can't we be >> up >> front about making the interoperabilty as one of the main requirements >> of this >> charter to provide an end-to-end solution? >> >> thanks, >> Padma . >> >> >> From: Brian Rosen <br@brianrosen.net> >> To: Richard Barnes <rbarnes@bbn.com>, "SENNETT, DEWAYNE A (ATTCINW)" >> <DS2225@att.com> >> Cc: earlywarning@ietf.org, "DOLLY, MARTIN C \(ATTLABS\)" >> <md3135@att.com> >> Date: 04/07/2010 05:55 PM >> Subject: Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Discussions >> >> >> >> >> I'm not bothered by the first part. I don't like the last phrase, >> because >> I'm not sure we should specifically describe such capabilities, and it >> may >> not be a gateway. How about changing the last sentence to "A goal of >> the >> work will be to be able to use layer-2 specific mechanisms, where >> available, >> to minimize load on the network." >> >> >> On 4/7/10 5:41 PM, "Richard Barnes" <rbarnes@bbn.com> wrote: >> >>> Ok, I can grant that that's something that's not clearly explained in >>> the current charter. However, it's also an issue that will tend to be >>> layer-2 specific. How about something like this: >>> >>> " >>> Emergency alerts that are delivered to large numbers of endpoints can >>> put a large load on the network, particularly when many affected users >>> are on the same local network (e.g., the 100,000 attendees at a >>> sporting event). This working group will consider mechanisms for >>> minimizing this load, such as IP multicast. In particular, some >>> approaches have been developed to handle emergency alerting in >>> different types networks, and it will be a goal of this working group >>> to facilitate interoperability with these approaches, for example, to >>> enable gateways to relay messages from this Internet mechanism into a >>> specific layer-2 channel. >>> " >>> >>> >>> >>> On Apr 7, 2010, at 4:47 PM, SENNETT, DEWAYNE A (ATTCINW) wrote: >>> >>>> It is deficient because it does not take into account the impacts that >>>> will occur to the various access technologies. All access >>>> technologies >>>> do not have the same capacity, bandwidth, etc. Therefore any design >>>> that >>>> has the potential to send information to all citizens within an area >>>> via >>>> any variety of access technologies needs to consider these factors. >>>> For >>>> example, consider the scenario of trying to send an alert to the >>>> 100,000 >>>> fans at a college football game. >>>> >>>> The current draft charter of ATOCA does not address this which is why >>>> the additional sentences for the second paragraph were proposed. >>>> >>>> DeWayne >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Richard Barnes [mailto:rbarnes@bbn.com <mailto:rbarnes@bbn.com> >>>> ] >>>> Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 1:38 PM >>>> To: SENNETT, DEWAYNE A (ATTCINW) >>>> Cc: DALY, BRIAN K (ATTCINW); Henning Schulzrinne; DOLLY, MARTIN C >>>> (ATTLABS); earlywarning@ietf.org >>>> Subject: Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Discussions >>>> >>>> Could you please clarify how you believe it to be deficient? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Apr 7, 2010, at 4:37 PM, SENNETT, DEWAYNE A (ATTCINW) wrote: >>>> >>>>> My "personal" view is that the charter as currently written is not >>>>> correct or adequate. >>>>> >>>>> DeWayne >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: earlywarning-bounces@ietf.org >>>>> [mailto:earlywarning-bounces@ietf.org >>>>> <mailto:earlywarning-bounces@ietf.org> ] On Behalf Of DALY, BRIAN K >>>>> (ATTCINW) >>>>> Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 1:33 PM >>>>> To: Henning Schulzrinne; DOLLY, MARTIN C (ATTLABS) >>>>> Cc: earlywarning@ietf.org >>>>> Subject: Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Discussions >>>>> >>>>> Fine but my "personal" view does not change. >>>>> >>>>> Brian Daly >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Henning Schulzrinne [mailto:hgs@cs.columbia.edu >>>>> <mailto:hgs@cs.columbia.edu> ] >>>>> Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 1:31 PM >>>>> To: DOLLY, MARTIN C (ATTLABS) >>>>> Cc: DALY, BRIAN K (ATTCINW); earlywarning@ietf.org >>>>> Subject: Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Discussions >>>>> >>>>> The point is that people speak as individuals in the IETF and there >>>>> is >>>>> no particular notion that a corporate opinion has any more weight >>>>> than >>>>> that of any individual. Thus, stating a corporate opinion is out of >>>>> place and against IETF custom and convention. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Henning >>>>> >>>>> On Apr 7, 2010, at 4:28 PM, DOLLY, MARTIN C (ATTLABS) wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> They sure do, look at everyone's badge >>>>>> >>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>>> From: earlywarning-bounces@ietf.org <earlywarning-bounces@ietf.org> >>>>>> To: DALY, BRIAN K (ATTCINW) >>>>>> Cc: earlywarning@ietf.org <earlywarning@ietf.org> >>>>>> Sent: Wed Apr 07 16:21:20 2010 >>>>>> Subject: Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Discussions >>>>>> >>>>>> I didn't know that the IETF had corporate opinions. But maybe the >>>>>> IETF >>>>> rules have changed recently? >>>>>> >>>>>> Henning >>>>>> >>>>>> On Apr 7, 2010, at 4:13 PM, DALY, BRIAN K (ATTCINW) wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> For the record, AT&T is in opposition to removing the last >>>>>>> sentence. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Brian Daly >>>>>>> AT&T >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> earlywarning mailing list >>>>>> earlywarning@ietf.org >>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning >>>>>> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> earlywarning mailing list >>>>> earlywarning@ietf.org >>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning >>>>> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> earlywarning mailing list >>>>> earlywarning@ietf.org >>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning >>>>> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> earlywarning mailing list >>> earlywarning@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning >>> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> earlywarning mailing list >> earlywarning@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning >> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning> >> >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > earlywarning mailing list > earlywarning@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning > _______________________________________________ > earlywarning mailing list > earlywarning@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning > > _______________________________________________ earlywarning mailing list earlywarning@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning
- [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Discuss… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Dis… SENNETT, DEWAYNE A (ATTCINW)
- Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Dis… ken carlberg
- Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Dis… DALY, BRIAN K (ATTCINW)
- Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Dis… Brian Rosen
- Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Dis… DALY, BRIAN K (ATTCINW)
- Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Dis… Marc Linsner
- Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Dis… DALY, BRIAN K (ATTCINW)
- Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Dis… Marc Linsner
- Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Dis… DALY, BRIAN K (ATTCINW)
- Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Dis… Marc Linsner
- Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Dis… DALY, BRIAN K (ATTCINW)
- Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Dis… Brian Rosen
- Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Dis… Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Dis… SENNETT, DEWAYNE A (ATTCINW)
- Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Dis… Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Dis… DALY, BRIAN K (ATTCINW)
- Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Dis… Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Dis… Marc Linsner
- Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Dis… Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Dis… DALY, BRIAN K (ATTCINW)
- Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Dis… MUSGROVE, CHARLES P (ATTCINW)
- Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Dis… Richard Barnes
- Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Dis… SENNETT, DEWAYNE A (ATTCINW)
- Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Dis… Richard Barnes
- Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Dis… SENNETT, DEWAYNE A (ATTCINW)
- Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Dis… James M. Polk
- Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Dis… James M. Polk
- Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Dis… Brian Rosen
- Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Dis… DALY, BRIAN K (ATTCINW)
- Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Dis… Richard Barnes
- Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Dis… Janet P Gunn
- Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Dis… Brian Rosen
- Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Dis… Richard Barnes
- Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Dis… Janet P Gunn
- Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Dis… DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Dis… DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Dis… ken carlberg
- Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Dis… Padma Valluri
- Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Dis… Brian Rosen
- Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Dis… Padma Valluri
- Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Dis… DALY, BRIAN K (ATTCINW)
- Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Dis… DALY, BRIAN K (ATTCINW)
- Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Dis… creed
- Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Dis… MUSGROVE, CHARLES P (ATTCINW)
- Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Dis… creed
- Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Dis… DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Dis… creed