Re: [earlywarning] Beijing agenda slots

"DALY, BRIAN K (ATTCINW)" <BD2985@att.com> Wed, 15 September 2010 03:32 UTC

Return-Path: <BD2985@att.com>
X-Original-To: earlywarning@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: earlywarning@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D43063A6A0C for <earlywarning@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 20:32:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yYYGe-gl+BCl for <earlywarning@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 20:32:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail161.messagelabs.com (mail161.messagelabs.com [216.82.253.115]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F7813A688F for <earlywarning@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 20:32:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-Env-Sender: BD2985@att.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-14.tower-161.messagelabs.com!1284521594!31873210!1
X-StarScan-Version: 6.2.4; banners=-,-,-
X-Originating-IP: [144.160.112.25]
Received: (qmail 21982 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2010 03:33:15 -0000
Received: from sbcsmtp3.sbc.com (HELO tlph064.enaf.dadc.sbc.com) (144.160.112.25) by server-14.tower-161.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 15 Sep 2010 03:33:15 -0000
Received: from enaf.dadc.sbc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by tlph064.enaf.dadc.sbc.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o8F3XEbP017083; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 22:33:14 -0500
Received: from td03xsmtp005.US.Cingular.Net (td03xsmtp005.us.cingular.net [135.179.64.44]) by tlph064.enaf.dadc.sbc.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o8F3X7Te017070; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 22:33:07 -0500
Received: from BD01XSMTP003.US.Cingular.Net ([135.163.18.44]) by td03xsmtp005.US.Cingular.Net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 14 Sep 2010 22:33:07 -0500
Received: from BD01MSXMB016.US.Cingular.Net ([135.214.27.50]) by BD01XSMTP003.US.Cingular.Net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 14 Sep 2010 20:33:06 -0700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 20:33:05 -0700
Message-ID: <FDFC6E6B2064844FBEB9045DF1E3FBBC011C6203@BD01MSXMB016.US.Cingular.Net>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [earlywarning] Beijing agenda slots
Thread-Index: ActUhfleaoAjOhFDQCmtqq2BeQUITQAALxD1
From: "DALY, BRIAN K (ATTCINW)" <BD2985@att.com>
To: <rbarnes@bbn.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Sep 2010 03:33:06.0823 (UTC) FILETIME=[B6221970:01CB5486]
Cc: keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com, earlywarning@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [earlywarning] Beijing agenda slots
X-BeenThere: earlywarning@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for Authority-to-Individuals \(Early Warning\) Emergency " <earlywarning.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning>, <mailto:earlywarning-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/earlywarning>
List-Post: <mailto:earlywarning@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:earlywarning-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning>, <mailto:earlywarning-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 03:32:53 -0000

I believe you need to establish a liaison with ATIS and 3GPP then as that would require standards support from lower layers. 
Brian K. Daly
   Sent to you by AT&T... 
   America's Fastest Mobile Broadband
       Network.  Rethink Possible.
   +1.425.580.6873
-------
Sent from my Blackberry

----- Original Message -----
From: Richard L. Barnes <rbarnes@bbn.com>
To: DALY, BRIAN K (ATTCINW)
Cc: keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>om>; mark.wood@engineer.com <mark.wood@engineer.com>om>; earlywarning@ietf.org <earlywarning@ietf.org>
Sent: Tue Sep 14 20:27:34 2010
Subject: Re: [earlywarning] Beijing agenda slots

I disagree.  I think Brian had it right that it would be good if the  
ATOCA system could benefit from other lower-layer or domain-specific  
systems.
--Richard


On Sep 14, 2010, at 8:42 PM, DALY, BRIAN K (ATTCINW) wrote:

> Agree. ATOCA is not cell broadcast based alerting. That work is done  
> in 3GPP and ATIS. There is no relationship to the ATOCA work and PWS.
> ------Original Message------
> From: DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
> To: mark.wood@engineer.com
> Cc: earlywarning@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [earlywarning] Beijing agenda slots
> Sent: Sep 14, 2010 7:30 AM
>
> Can I suggest you read the charter of ATOCA before introducing 4G  
> discussions to the meetings.
>
> It is not the function of ATOCA to define a replacement for cell  
> broadcast systems of warning.
>
> Keith
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: earlywarning-bounces@ietf.org
>> [mailto:earlywarning-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mark Wood
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 10:23 AM
>> To: Thomson, Martin
>> Cc: earlywarning@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [earlywarning] Beijing agenda slots
>>
>>
>> Hi People;
>>
>> I am Mark Wood, the convener of the ITU-T SG2 liaison on
>> "multicast address space harmonization for civic purposes".
>>
>> As a matter of reference for your kind attention, I can take
>> a few minutes to describe the mechanism of cell broadcasting
>> in 2nd and 3rd generation mobile networks and explain the
>> ITU-T SG2 liaison, so that we can discuss if any of the
>> discoveries made there are of any relevance to the ATOCA
>> deliberations or not.
>>
>> The ITU is not seeking any infuence over IETF deliberations,
>> but the process at ITU has been on going for 4 years, and a
>> lot of discoveries were made in that time which you may find
>> interesting.
>>
>> The next ITU-T SG2 meeting is the week after the IETF, so I
>> will be in a position to relay to them any thoughts or
>> observations that you may have.
>> At the last ITU meeting Nov 2009, questions were raised on
>> the matter of 4G mobile networks and how they would
>> accommodate public warnings,
>
> ------Original Message Truncated------
>
> Brian K. Daly
>   Sent to you by AT&T...
>   America's Fastest Mobile Broadband
>       Network.  Rethink Possible.
>   +1.425.580.6873
> -------
> Sent from my Blackberry
> _______________________________________________
> earlywarning mailing list
> earlywarning@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning