Re: [earlywarning] Beijing agenda slots

I believe you need to establish a liaison with ATIS and 3GPP then as that would require standards support from lower layers. 
Brian K. Daly
   Sent to you by AT&T... 
   America's Fastest Mobile Broadband
       Network.  Rethink Possible.
   +1.425.580.6873
-------
Sent from my Blackberry

----- Original Message -----
From: Richard L. Barnes <rbarnes@bbn.com>
To: DALY, BRIAN K (ATTCINW)
Cc: keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>; mark.wood@engineer.com <mark.wood@engineer.com>; earlywarning@ietf.org <earlywarning@ietf.org>
Sent: Tue Sep 14 20:27:34 2010
Subject: Re: [earlywarning] Beijing agenda slots

I disagree.  I think Brian had it right that it would be good if the  
ATOCA system could benefit from other lower-layer or domain-specific  
systems.
--Richard

On Sep 14, 2010, at 8:42 PM, DALY, BRIAN K (ATTCINW) wrote:

> Agree. ATOCA is not cell broadcast based alerting. That work is done  
> in 3GPP and ATIS. There is no relationship to the ATOCA work and PWS.
> ------Original Message------
> From: DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
> To: mark.wood@engineer.com
> Cc: earlywarning@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [earlywarning] Beijing agenda slots
> Sent: Sep 14, 2010 7:30 AM
>
> Can I suggest you read the charter of ATOCA before introducing 4G  
> discussions to the meetings.
>
> It is not the function of ATOCA to define a replacement for cell  
> broadcast systems of warning.
>
> Keith
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: earlywarning-bounces@ietf.org
>> [mailto:earlywarning-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mark Wood
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 10:23 AM
>> To: Thomson, Martin
>> Cc: earlywarning@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [earlywarning] Beijing agenda slots
>>
>>
>> Hi People;
>>
>> I am Mark Wood, the convener of the ITU-T SG2 liaison on
>> "multicast address space harmonization for civic purposes".
>>
>> As a matter of reference for your kind attention, I can take
>> a few minutes to describe the mechanism of cell broadcasting
>> in 2nd and 3rd generation mobile networks and explain the
>> ITU-T SG2 liaison, so that we can discuss if any of the
>> discoveries made there are of any relevance to the ATOCA
>> deliberations or not.
>>
>> The ITU is not seeking any infuence over IETF deliberations,
>> but the process at ITU has been on going for 4 years, and a
>> lot of discoveries were made in that time which you may find
>> interesting.
>>
>> The next ITU-T SG2 meeting is the week after the IETF, so I
>> will be in a position to relay to them any thoughts or
>> observations that you may have.
>> At the last ITU meeting Nov 2009, questions were raised on
>> the matter of 4G mobile networks and how they would
>> accommodate public warnings,
>
> ------Original Message Truncated------
>
> Brian K. Daly
>   Sent to you by AT&T...
>   America's Fastest Mobile Broadband
>       Network.  Rethink Possible.
>   +1.425.580.6873
> -------
> Sent from my Blackberry
> _______________________________________________
> earlywarning mailing list
> earlywarning@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning