Re: [earlywarning] status?

Even if we can't be on the agenda, I'd be glad to have an ad-hoc  
meeting, especially if we have some drafts!

On Jul 1, 2010, at 5:08 PM, James M. Polk wrote:

> Robert
>
> Thanks for putting in the effort on this, and updating us. That  
> said, is there any way this pre-WG can meet in Maastricht, or do we  
> have to wait until Beijing?
>
> James
>
> At 01:50 PM 7/1/2010, Robert Sparks wrote:
>
>> I don't believe we need another BoF and am working on getting the  
>> working group chartered.
>> I am taking this to the IESG. Unless I encounter something  
>> unexpected, it will go out for external review before Maastricht.
>>
>> RjS
>>
>> On Jul 1, 2010, at 12:06 PM, Richard L. Barnes wrote:
>>
>>> I think the charter has been submitted to the IESG, and is waiting  
>>> on action from the ADs.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jul 1, 2010, at 1:05 PM, ken carlberg wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> given the latest charter that was circulated around, does anyone  
>>>> know if there was an attempt for another BoF, or to establish a  
>>>> WG for this effort?
>>>>
>>>> -ken
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> earlywarning mailing list
>>>> <mailto:earlywarning@ietf.org>earlywarning@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> earlywarning mailing list
>> earlywarning@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning
>
> _______________________________________________
> earlywarning mailing list
> earlywarning@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning