Re: [earlywarning] [CAP] Definition of Warning Categories

Art Botterell <acb@incident.com> Sun, 12 July 2009 15:51 UTC

Return-Path: <acb@incident.com>
X-Original-To: earlywarning@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: earlywarning@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54FB43A6C13 for <earlywarning@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 08:51:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.265
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.265 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pvYF839zSYS4 for <earlywarning@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 08:51:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp109.sbc.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (smtp109.sbc.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [67.195.14.39]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 7C3D03A6C14 for <earlywarning@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 08:51:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 26583 invoked from network); 12 Jul 2009 15:51:45 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO postfix.incident.com) (acb@99.182.125.96 with login) by smtp109.sbc.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 12 Jul 2009 15:51:45 -0000
X-Yahoo-SMTP: vPhT.EeswBCqpJNRI7jKigo5rdzzHPEykVa7e4bkNNvf
X-YMail-OSG: Y67cYlIVM1nxUuThtG7pmsawGm5riYrtB0qJoZabhUy6l8ifJIrGI5A98Pi3MZRJ9flDK29xt.X7m1dlO7whu3mtNvXzQc_Kxlr5vKfDrhuEnJVOtzwjD5vQnuGINCtVQoJtdeabVTGNgimBm6ac1IbsAvuq4Cs_D77lzuNHU_bMFG0H.Asgqdo77u8WkuVC41ygFMpXDK90ARhg628exkrKlCON3YfP1By38AglzbF3JHybY.E6IfTYRsxPhPP0Nawj7zGDdUqN5ms-
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.incident.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FC182063171; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 08:51:44 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <8C3B4F90-C248-418C-9DC3-D9EFAFCCFF50@incident.com>
From: Art Botterell <acb@incident.com>
To: cap-list@incident.com, earlywarning@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <187701ca02df$a80ff0e0$501ca20a@nsnintra.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3)
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 08:51:43 -0700
References: <187701ca02df$a80ff0e0$501ca20a@nsnintra.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3)
Subject: Re: [earlywarning] [CAP] Definition of Warning Categories
X-BeenThere: earlywarning@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for Authority-to-Individuals \(Early Warning\) Emergency " <earlywarning.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning>, <mailto:earlywarning-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/earlywarning>
List-Post: <mailto:earlywarning@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:earlywarning-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning>, <mailto:earlywarning-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 15:51:18 -0000

On Jul 12, 2009, at 7/12/09 3:58 AM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
> I was wondering whether there is somewhere a more verbose / more  
> complete
> description of the semantic of the individual values.

No, and that's deliberate.  Considering the high levels of uncertainty  
that so often surround emergent events, the CAP designers (first in  
the CAP Working Group and later within OASIS) struggled to balance  
completeness against specificity.  There was also a concern that we  
could get bogged down in trying to perfect the taxonomies and wind up  
with no standard at all.

So the definitions were deliberately left somewhat open-ended and  
contextual... some would go so far as to say "vague" and I, for one,  
wouldn't argue.

- Art