Re: [earlywarning] [CAP] Definition of Warning Categories

Art Botterell <artbotterell@gmail.com> Wed, 15 July 2009 17:02 UTC

Return-Path: <artbotterell@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: earlywarning@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: earlywarning@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC60B28C24A for <earlywarning@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 10:02:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A17Ni9M2xPJp for <earlywarning@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 10:02:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.248]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6AA628C10D for <earlywarning@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 10:02:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c37so1750820anc.4 for <earlywarning@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 10:02:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:reply-to:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=TqG12c3eUjTXr0YmOo26fHClAYbvEzj+3gv84s3B8dw=; b=HAx5DLd5P1TNqPanqrIqNUzK1/G1CwuBGrPWFyiHwCxLtRoy2WkTsQcMN+VlL8FR6i 77YqQVc1zPPd900+UclI+4TEp8pT9FrRFeCmmuxHcyiBefFpL/GibaR3qUCpmIpDXuGr 86mGD8844Y8uuzRuwv9EesX7AqjGl5MMqpAE8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=f5RIc9tpmgye1VSIGPNFPkM8IJmbQDilL6/id6VPqvPIMW68E+4WSwtN3dXYohRMmj Wqm44TYsBJH8ln0rWn73wWSan8hHm8oCqi9yQ2E0/ARkf7f0Z/HDIia+9tzpbCgnw4vB q/2NBoR0aIbVmxJQL/3039MdJyMgoXsx3cco8=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.144.14 with SMTP id r14mr10526342and.65.1247677339105; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 10:02:19 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <021501ca0551$bca043b0$1116a20a@nsnintra.net>
References: <82AE05D27DEDB04488869E55FDAB71FDA1C0FB@s-gov-mail-4.govaxa.ai> <18ee01ca0322$b7a97d30$501ca20a@nsnintra.net> <30076E62-60BC-4488-9F10-33686E82E657@incident.com> <34E56644D3334E8D876CD9368814657E@xppc1> <XFE-SJC-211xvjPkQTG00001d60@xfe-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com> <EDC0A1AE77C57744B664A310A0B23AE20702F355@FRMRSSXCHMBSC3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com> <4A5DD81E.7090803@netmagic.com> <021501ca0551$bca043b0$1116a20a@nsnintra.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 10:02:19 -0700
Message-ID: <2e53e6590907151002k4b12905di6e29ac0bbda8721c@mail.gmail.com>
From: Art Botterell <artbotterell@gmail.com>
To: Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0016e644cc6e977a04046ec18422"
Cc: earlywarning@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [earlywarning] [CAP] Definition of Warning Categories
X-BeenThere: earlywarning@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: acb@incident.com
List-Id: "Discussion list for Authority-to-Individuals \(Early Warning\) Emergency " <earlywarning.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning>, <mailto:earlywarning-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/earlywarning>
List-Post: <mailto:earlywarning@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:earlywarning-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning>, <mailto:earlywarning-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 17:16:11 -0000

On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 6:39 AM, Hannes Tschofenig <
Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net> wrote:

>  From my citizen-to-authority emergency services experience I can tell you
> that you cannot create such a
> "single community" regardless of how much work you spend.


I think that's right.  Emergency services don't function as a separate
community, but rather as a facet of the larger communities and cultures they
serve.  Notions like "authority" and even "emergency" are constructed very
differently in different places and in different contexts.

(For an example of how subtle and controversial even seemingly simple
notions of emergency response can be, see my blog entry on standards of
practice for public warning at <http://www.incident.com/blog>... I'm
presenting it at the Natural Hazards Workshop in Boulder Colorado this
week.  Note also that "public warning" in the tactical sense and "early
warning" of significant events are themselves quite different topics.)

What we're really talking about here seems to be how to apply SIP to urgent
one-to-many notifications.  Maybe if it were explicit that narrower, more
technical goal would be more tractable.

- Art