Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Discussions

Henning Schulzrinne <hgs@cs.columbia.edu> Wed, 07 April 2010 20:21 UTC

Return-Path: <hgs@cs.columbia.edu>
X-Original-To: earlywarning@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: earlywarning@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B4DC28C0E0 for <earlywarning@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 13:21:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SssC5U2pZFb6 for <earlywarning@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 13:21:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from serrano.cc.columbia.edu (serrano.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.29.6]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61C0128C146 for <earlywarning@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 13:21:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ice.cs.columbia.edu (ice.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.18.177]) (user=hgs10 mech=PLAIN bits=0) by serrano.cc.columbia.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o37KLK9x006373 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 7 Apr 2010 16:21:20 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1078)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Henning Schulzrinne <hgs@cs.columbia.edu>
In-Reply-To: <FDFC6E6B2064844FBEB9045DF1E3FBBC4F8149@BD01MSXMB016.US.Cingular.Net>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 16:21:20 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5418ABAC-8210-4A89-8B2F-0742EEB48045@cs.columbia.edu>
References: <C99FF8B7-61F4-4A05-8389-4F90E43F12F4@g11.org.uk> <C7E25F64.232E8%mlinsner@cisco.com> <FDFC6E6B2064844FBEB9045DF1E3FBBC4F8149@BD01MSXMB016.US.Cingular.Net>
To: "DALY, BRIAN K (ATTCINW)" <BD2985@att.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1078)
X-No-Spam-Score: Local
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 128.59.29.6
Cc: earlywarning@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Discussions
X-BeenThere: earlywarning@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for Authority-to-Individuals \(Early Warning\) Emergency " <earlywarning.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning>, <mailto:earlywarning-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/earlywarning>
List-Post: <mailto:earlywarning@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:earlywarning-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning>, <mailto:earlywarning-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 20:21:50 -0000

I didn't know that the IETF had corporate opinions. But maybe the IETF rules have changed recently?

Henning

On Apr 7, 2010, at 4:13 PM, DALY, BRIAN K (ATTCINW) wrote:

> For the record, AT&T is in opposition to removing the last sentence.
> 
> Brian Daly
> AT&T