Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Discussions

"DALY, BRIAN K (ATTCINW)" <BD2985@att.com> Wed, 07 April 2010 20:17 UTC

Return-Path: <BD2985@att.com>
X-Original-To: earlywarning@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: earlywarning@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89C5B28C10B for <earlywarning@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 13:17:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j0ckfm9kGlOP for <earlywarning@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 13:17:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail167.messagelabs.com (mail167.messagelabs.com [216.82.253.179]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 831213A68D8 for <earlywarning@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 13:17:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-Env-Sender: BD2985@att.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-11.tower-167.messagelabs.com!1270671428!31522038!1
X-StarScan-Version: 6.2.4; banners=-,-,-
X-Originating-IP: [144.160.112.25]
Received: (qmail 26542 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2010 20:17:09 -0000
Received: from sbcsmtp3.sbc.com (HELO tlph064.enaf.dadc.sbc.com) (144.160.112.25) by server-11.tower-167.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 7 Apr 2010 20:17:09 -0000
Received: from enaf.dadc.sbc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by tlph064.enaf.dadc.sbc.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o37KH7k9031499; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 15:17:08 -0500
Received: from td03xsmtp006.US.Cingular.Net (td03xspare19-new.us.cingular.net [135.179.64.43] (may be forged)) by tlph064.enaf.dadc.sbc.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o37KH5bS031451; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 15:17:05 -0500
Received: from bd01xsmtp004.US.Cingular.Net ([135.163.18.45]) by td03xsmtp006.US.Cingular.Net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 7 Apr 2010 15:17:05 -0500
Received: from BD01MSXMB016.US.Cingular.Net ([135.214.27.50]) by bd01xsmtp004.US.Cingular.Net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 7 Apr 2010 13:17:04 -0700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 13:17:02 -0700
Message-ID: <FDFC6E6B2064844FBEB9045DF1E3FBBC4F8153@BD01MSXMB016.US.Cingular.Net>
In-Reply-To: <C7E25FEB.232EB%mlinsner@cisco.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Discussions
thread-index: AcrWi0usG9/KhYhZR3OiTWO1oA9w7wAAJi8QAACEjncAAAkMAAAANYraAAAHcOA=
References: <FDFC6E6B2064844FBEB9045DF1E3FBBC4F813A@BD01MSXMB016.US.Cingular.Net> <C7E25FEB.232EB%mlinsner@cisco.com>
From: "DALY, BRIAN K (ATTCINW)" <BD2985@att.com>
To: "Marc Linsner" <mlinsner@cisco.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Apr 2010 20:17:04.0026 (UTC) FILETIME=[49CC17A0:01CAD68F]
Cc: earlywarning@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Discussions
X-BeenThere: earlywarning@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for Authority-to-Individuals \(Early Warning\) Emergency " <earlywarning.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning>, <mailto:earlywarning-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/earlywarning>
List-Post: <mailto:earlywarning@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:earlywarning-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning>, <mailto:earlywarning-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 20:17:13 -0000

The opt-in was not a market decision - I disagree. It was a
congressional and FCC mandate stemmed from the WARN Act resulting in the
FCC Part 10 rules.

ATOCA does not fall under that.

Brian

-----Original Message-----
From: Marc Linsner [mailto:mlinsner@cisco.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 1:15 PM
To: DALY, BRIAN K (ATTCINW)
Cc: earlywarning@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Discussions

The opt-in was a market decision, not a requirement.

If ATOCA builds a different solution, it too will be a market decision
to
offer or not.

-Marc-


On 4/7/10 4:09 PM, "DALY, BRIAN K (ATTCINW)" <BD2985@att.com> wrote:

> But those operators that opt-in must follow the FCC Part 10 rules for
> CMAS. So I do nto understand your comment.
> 
> Brian
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc Linsner [mailto:mlinsner@cisco.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 1:08 PM
> To: DALY, BRIAN K (ATTCINW)
> Cc: earlywarning@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Discussions
> 
> CMAS was opt-in by the carriers, not a requirement....??
> 
> -Marc-
> 
> 
> On 4/7/10 3:56 PM, "DALY, BRIAN K (ATTCINW)" <BD2985@att.com> wrote:
> 
>> The second is more than a market decision - it is an interaction with
> a
>> regulatory requirement.
>> 
>> Perhaps a better way to phrase is as follows:
>> 
>> "Additionally, ATOCA will not interfere with nor replace solutions
>> designed to meet regulatory requirements for any authority to citizen
>> alerting of any access technology."
>> 
>> Brian Daly
>> AT&T
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: earlywarning-bounces@ietf.org
>> [mailto:earlywarning-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of ken carlberg
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 12:48 PM
>> To: SENNETT, DEWAYNE A (ATTCINW)
>> Cc: Hannes Tschofenig; earlywarning@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Discussions
>> 
>> 
>> On Apr 7, 2010, at 11:30 AM, SENNETT, DEWAYNE A (ATTCINW) wrote:
>> 
>>> "The ATOCA solutions will not adversely affect the ability of any
>> access
>>> technology to provide emergency services to the citizens (e.g. 9-1-1
>>> calls) or to provide communication services to first responders or
>> other
>>> authorized emergency services personnel.  Additionally, ATOCA is not
>>> replacement solution for any authority to citizen alerting supported
>> by
>>> any access technology."
>> 
>> given the previous thread on this list, I'm a bit leery of that first
>> sentence.  But, if it were agreed to add it in, then I would expect
> the
>> individuals who make a claim that an ATOCA solution adversely affects
>> 9-1-1 type calls will be required to prove it instead of simply
> stating
>> a position.
>> 
>> as for the second sentence, that is out of scope of the IETF.  any
>> deployment of what is considered an ATOCA solution is a market
> decision.
>> 
>> -ken
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> earlywarning mailing list
>> earlywarning@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning
>> _______________________________________________
>> earlywarning mailing list
>> earlywarning@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning
> 
>