[Atoca] Requirement D2: "Large Audience"

Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> Sat, 15 January 2011 19:28 UTC

Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: earlywarning@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: earlywarning@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3350828C0DB for <earlywarning@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 15 Jan 2011 11:28:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.61
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.61 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.011, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RpLPOka2mFWm for <earlywarning@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 15 Jan 2011 11:27:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E20263A6E25 for <earlywarning@ietf.org>; Sat, 15 Jan 2011 11:27:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 15 Jan 2011 19:30:27 -0000
Received: from a88-115-222-204.elisa-laajakaista.fi (EHLO [192.168.1.7]) [88.115.222.204] by mail.gmx.net (mp060) with SMTP; 15 Jan 2011 20:30:27 +0100
X-Authenticated: #29516787
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/kA+M1Durkc3n3zeLQa6Exxlwi/NSf8Hg+sc+wUM hf8Pu0BKGE5n1N
From: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 21:30:24 +0200
Message-Id: <AC859123-98E0-4188-8898-0CBBDA567FBC@gmx.net>
To: earlywarning@ietf.org, Igor Faynberg <igor.faynberg@alcatel-lucent.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Subject: [Atoca] Requirement D2: "Large Audience"
X-BeenThere: earlywarning@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for the IETF Authority-to-Citizen Alert \(atoca\) working group." <earlywarning.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning>, <mailto:earlywarning-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/earlywarning>
List-Post: <mailto:earlywarning@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:earlywarning-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning>, <mailto:earlywarning-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 19:28:00 -0000

Hi all, 

during the ATOCA meeting at IETF#79 Igor raised a question regarding requirement D2:
"
   Req-D2:

      The protocol solution MUST allow delivery of messages
      simultaneously to a large audience.
"

He was asking whether there is a need to put a number for large audience there.

Maybe Igor has a specific number in mind that would matter from a protocol design perspective but I do not have such a number that would provide a meaningful distinction. 

There is, however, the question what types of problems we expect with very large number of alert message receivers and how we document this aspect in the requirements document. 

Suggestions? Thoughts? 

Ciao
Hannes