Re: [EAT] Preliminary RATS BoF Agenda

"Eric Voit (evoit)" <evoit@cisco.com> Sun, 21 October 2018 13:20 UTC

Return-Path: <evoit@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: eat@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eat@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C9E8130DE8; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 06:20:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h0qI6KlzRKqO; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 06:20:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40E2F12D4EA; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 06:20:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4500; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1540128008; x=1541337608; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=nb2c+0e4X45GRDjhLlKdF/3hrT9P6Xhg7kO/zoFpwSc=; b=bHeJy2esNIB02dtPJSIY2IwH6ls2KHk3cGmmDQb6S4yWaU+yy7aRuGMg JMDdFiM3UX7iFIDIc6sskbQMY6476CzSpzBzry9jt7YOWCmldD4p8b75B ZwS7ekjNz6LN3HikQat4noMcKCPk0zsfVRWjVRaOKSqxZh4tc478Zysoj c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0ARAACgfMxb/5FdJa1kGgEBAQEBAgE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEHAgEBAQGBUQUBAQEBCwGBWipmfygKg2uIGIwYgg2DP5NWFIFmCwEBGAi?= =?us-ascii?q?ETAIXhHEhNA0NAQMBAQIBAQJtHAyFOgEBAQEBAQEBASEROgIJBQcEAgEGAhE?= =?us-ascii?q?EAQEDAiYCAgIlCxUICAIEAQ0FCIMagXkID4hTm02BLoQsARFAhQ8FgQuJKoE?= =?us-ascii?q?dF4FBPyZrgxKDGwEBAQEBF4EUAQwGATaCbIJXAohSlXYJAoZggx2DFoNVH4F?= =?us-ascii?q?SIoRRiWmMWIleAhEUgSYdOGRxcBU7gmyDOgECgkiFFIU+bwGIaw4XgQiBHwE?= =?us-ascii?q?B?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.54,408,1534809600"; d="scan'208";a="469503666"
Received: from rcdn-core-9.cisco.com ([173.37.93.145]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Oct 2018 13:19:36 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (xch-rtp-013.cisco.com [64.101.220.153]) by rcdn-core-9.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w9LDJaqT020061 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sun, 21 Oct 2018 13:19:36 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-013.cisco.com (64.101.220.153) by XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (64.101.220.153) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 09:19:36 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-013.cisco.com ([64.101.220.153]) by XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com ([64.101.220.153]) with mapi id 15.00.1395.000; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 09:19:35 -0400
From: "Eric Voit (evoit)" <evoit@cisco.com>
To: Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@arm.com>, Henk Birkholz <henk.birkholz@sit.fraunhofer.de>, "rats@ietf.org" <rats@ietf.org>
CC: "eat@ietf.org" <eat@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [EAT] Preliminary RATS BoF Agenda
Thread-Index: AQHUaGGNvCYySbrjaE+BAKDogaa266UoT+VggAFc2DA=
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2018 13:19:35 +0000
Message-ID: <45f29705a33140c58c03ddadf65f6a7f@XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com>
References: <d9f63399-5fa1-e220-22f3-3e85596a589f@sit.fraunhofer.de> <AM5PR0801MB209735CCC5CF80CCE96E9670FAFA0@AM5PR0801MB2097.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <AM5PR0801MB209735CCC5CF80CCE96E9670FAFA0@AM5PR0801MB2097.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.118.56.234]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 64.101.220.153, xch-rtp-013.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-9.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eat/CIfdPfrhmPCpaDwodvFrhoI6KrU>
Subject: Re: [EAT] Preliminary RATS BoF Agenda
X-BeenThere: eat@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: EAT - Entity Attestation Token <eat.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eat>, <mailto:eat-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eat/>
List-Post: <mailto:eat@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eat-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eat>, <mailto:eat-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2018 13:20:11 -0000

> From: Hannes Tschofenig, October 20, 2018 12:21 PM
> 
> Hi Henk,
> 
> Could you say something more about agenda item #4 called "Compromise
> Trustworthy Visibility in Working Systems"?

Hi Hannes,

I will be doing agenda item #4.  Basically this agenda item was added to address a question raised on earlier on the RATS/EAT threads: is there a real business problem here?

To me the answer is yes.  For over a year Cisco has offered a controller based Integrity Verification application.  This application does remote attestation for routers.  See:
https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/cloud-systems-management/application-policy-infrastructure-controller-enterprise-module/1-5-x/integrity_verification/user-guide/Cisco_Integrity_Verification_Application_APIC-EM_User_Guide_1_5_0_x.pdf

Agenda item #4 will give a brief demo of production PCR results flowing up to a monitoring application, talk about some lessons learned, and give an idea of where proposed WG efforts might help future types of router to controller communications.

Eric

> Agenda item #2 sounds a bit like you would be talking about RATS drafts?
> Correct?
> 
> I am missing a "Here is the problem we are solving and this is why we will make
> the Internet work better" presentation.
> 
> Ciao
> Hannes
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: EAT <eat-bounces@ietf.org>; On Behalf Of Henk Birkholz
> Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2018 3:42 AM
> To: rats@ietf.org
> Cc: eat@ietf.org
> Subject: [EAT] Preliminary RATS BoF Agenda
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> please find below a first agenda draft for the RATS BoF ("may be subject to
> change") create by the BoF proponents. In order to support the discussion
> about intersection of RATS and EAT, we reserved a presentation slot for the
> EAT draft.
> 
> > RATS BOF Agenda at IETF 103 in Bangkok, Thailand Tuesday, November
> > 6th, 2018, Chitlada 2 Afternoon Session I 1350-1550 (UTC+7)
> >
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/103/floor-plan?room=chitlada-2
> >
> > 0)  Minute Takers, Jabber Scribe, Bluesheets (chairs)
> >
> > 1)  Hello Room & Agenda Bash (chairs)
> >
> > 2)  Introduction & Summary of Current IETF Work (Ned & Henk)
> >
> > 3)  The Entity Attestation Token (TBD)
> >
> > 4)  Compromise Trustworthy Visibility in Working Systems (Eric)
> >
> > 5)  Charter Text Discussion (Ned & Henk)
> >
> > 6)  Wrap Up (chairs)
> 
> The current plan is to limit presentations to approx. 15 min or shorter
> - item 5 is an exception to this rule as it is intended to be a kick-off
> presentation to start charter discussions in the time remaining until wrap up.
> 
> Viele Grüße,
> 
> Henk
> 
> _______________________________________________
> EAT mailing list
> EAT@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eat
> IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are
> confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient,
> please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any
> other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any
> medium. Thank you.
> _______________________________________________
> EAT mailing list
> EAT@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eat