Re: [EAT] [Rats] Rats and EAT

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Thu, 12 July 2018 00:50 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: eat@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eat@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9D15130FC7; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 17:50:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 909CVDtHasE4; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 17:50:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8460B130DE3; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 17:50:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 044562008C; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 21:06:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id A0060B7A; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 20:46:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DB6B9B0; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 20:46:13 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: "eat@ietf.org" <eat@ietf.org>, "rats@ietf.org" <rats@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <0FE06C34-D430-451C-834B-0A39082160BA@island-resort.com>
References: <eb1d952b-1e73-4c41-bf12-82299b44ff3d@me.com> <0FE06C34-D430-451C-834B-0A39082160BA@island-resort.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 20:46:13 -0400
Message-ID: <32302.1531356373@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eat/pXMkj74GhfMU_0OXvdJrCvlVA4o>
Subject: Re: [EAT] [Rats] Rats and EAT
X-BeenThere: eat@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: EAT - Entity Attestation Token <eat.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eat>, <mailto:eat-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eat/>
List-Post: <mailto:eat@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eat-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eat>, <mailto:eat-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 00:50:47 -0000

Laurence Lundblade <lgl@island-resort.com> wrote:
    > NEA is oriented around network management, trying to track the security
    > posture of devices in an enterprise's network. EAT is broadly targeted
    > at establishing trust between entities, often consumer devices (phones,
    > refrigerators, cars...) and servers/services (online banking, IoT
    > services, enterprise authentication…).

That's a surprising claim that EAT is going to broker trust between my phone
and my refrigerator.    Will it do this via third parties, or directly?

Please tell me more about this aspect.

-- 
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-