[Ecrit] Review of draft-ietf-ecrit-car-crash-21

Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com> Fri, 13 January 2017 09:28 UTC

Return-Path: <dromasca@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ecrit@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 689C412944F; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 01:28:25 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com>
To: <gen-art@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.40.3
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <148429970538.26834.8601617779578525696.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 01:28:25 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ecrit/1evnqZPO_x_XUEqoTdiW3k7RqX4>
Cc: draft-ietf-ecrit-car-crash.all@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, ecrit@ietf.org
Subject: [Ecrit] Review of draft-ietf-ecrit-car-crash-21
X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
List-Id: <ecrit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ecrit/>
List-Post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 09:28:25 -0000

Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

For more information, please see the FAQ at


Document: draft-ietf-ecrit-car-crash-21
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review Date: 2017-01-13
IETF LC End Date: 2017-01-06
IESG Telechat date: 2017-01-19

Summary: Ready

It's a good and useful document which needs to be read and understood
together with the eCall document, and other relevant documents from
EC, NENA, APCOT. The IETF Last Call review included a number of
comments which were considered and appropriately addressed. Thank you.

Major issues:

Minor issues:

Nits/editorial comments: