Re: [Ecrit] Objection to draft-ietf-ecrit-ecall progressing to state "Submitted to IESG for Publication"

Christer Holmberg <> Tue, 29 November 2016 19:57 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 324C3129C54 for <>; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 11:57:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.221
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.221 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o_kW1BOvHj0n for <>; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 11:57:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF54D129C47 for <>; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 11:57:03 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb30-83bff70000000c18-6e-583ddd8d7816
Received: from (Unknown_Domain []) by (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 3E.FB.03096.D8DDD385; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 20:57:02 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 20:57:01 +0100
From: Christer Holmberg <>
To: Ivo Sedlacek <>, "" <>
Thread-Topic: Objection to draft-ietf-ecrit-ecall progressing to state "Submitted to IESG for Publication"
Thread-Index: AdJFbsXsFLqBou5eRfmZkKIHQi68XQD77loQAEcH03A=
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 19:57:00 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrGLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM2K7lm7fXdsIgxsX2S0aFz1ldWD0WLLk J1MAYxSXTUpqTmZZapG+XQJXxpp3p9gKvrNVLPi+i7WB8QRrFyMnh4SAiUTzubnsXYxcHEIC 6xglfszYBuUsZpQ49fIiUxcjBwebgIVE9z9tkAYRgUCJl/+msYDYwgLZEusm3GWFiOdIrNj0 nw3CtpK4++s8M4jNIqAq8X3/DbAaXgFfieff10LN384osfbvZ1aQ+ZwCiRIH53qB1DAKiEl8 P7WGCcRmFhCXuPVkPhPEoQISS/ZAzJQQEJV4+fgf1ANKEiu2X2KEqNeRWLD7ExuErS2xbOFr Zoi9ghInZz5hmcAoMgvJ2FlIWmYhaZmFpGUBI8sqRtHi1OKk3HQjI73Uoszk4uL8PL281JJN jMDQP7jlt8EOxpfPHQ8xCnAwKvHwfphuGyHEmlhWXJl7iFGCg1lJhJf5JlCINyWxsiq1KD++ qDQntfgQozQHi5I4r9nK++FCAumJJanZqakFqUUwWSYOTqkGxpj9c9ReHma9+LtDKMCVY8W7 Vef/mU3b/P9BBteu5c+2+FY2Jz+oZy479mH9k1UP97w5KlSc13M171f8ilnn8j81pGy3+J3H UMj+aWtynPvpT7ND5h5NurP1zzyHOwFxsWe94l5l/tWe/ja+YKvNgdOtF0o1PvEuu8IcFBjK LGJyt1p/7oYFLuuVWIozEg21mIuKEwExdl9LeQIAAA==
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Ecrit] Objection to draft-ietf-ecrit-ecall progressing to state "Submitted to IESG for Publication"
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 19:57:05 -0000


I also indicated (18th October) that I want to solve the issues before we move the draft forward. There have also been suggestions on how to solve issues. 



-----Original Message-----
From: Ecrit [] On Behalf Of Ivo Sedlacek
Sent: 28 November 2016 12:08
Subject: [Ecrit] Objection to draft-ietf-ecrit-ecall progressing to state "Submitted to IESG for Publication"


I noticed that WG state of draft-ietf-ecrit-ecall changed to "Submitted to IESG for Publication" despite a comment (ISSUE 7 in the attached) raised during WGLC was not resolved, even though the issue was confirmed by other people and even though it was requested that the issue is solved before publication request.

I am formally objecting to this state change.

Kind regards

Ivo Sedlacek