IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Ecrit] draft-ietf-ecrit-similar-location-03 feedback - additional

Dan Banks <DBanks@ddti.net> Mon, 17 October 2016 20:18 UTC

Return-Path: <DBanks@ddti.net>
X-Original-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F6771295A5 for <ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Oct 2016 13:18:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.921
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.921 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=digitaldatatech.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cwmDiNgR40HI for <ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Oct 2016 13:18:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NAM01-BN3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn3nam01on0076.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.33.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43CF1129983 for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Oct 2016 13:18:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=digitaldatatech.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-ddti-net; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=/Kn+2CsxhEL42F03r32UvCHB/iWc/xvwWXhlEqMZDjE=; b=jfK1SyvJGQYrRCt1P/un7GXmP9a/K4tzThXqvfpuOLydwsDE7UCkd2fhUBer2BxycNY9Pmh0fQy5lJXcXbWqW4NDPh5JtN5EEG10QJq5kALIQSfy0SbdvpkcTxdOQaY/VjUvqtCPz2gPnh/5WjwtpEEL0R11iWqQo0W3pA0HdnA=
Received: from MWHPR17MB1071.namprd17.prod.outlook.com (10.173.122.9) by MWHPR17MB1072.namprd17.prod.outlook.com (10.173.122.10) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.659.11; Mon, 17 Oct 2016 20:18:46 +0000
Received: from MWHPR17MB1071.namprd17.prod.outlook.com ([10.173.122.9]) by MWHPR17MB1071.namprd17.prod.outlook.com ([10.173.122.9]) with mapi id 15.01.0659.025; Mon, 17 Oct 2016 20:18:46 +0000
From: Dan Banks <DBanks@ddti.net>
To: "ecrit@ietf.org" <ecrit@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-ecrit-similar-location-03 feedback - additional
Thread-Index: AdImVs8NPtvfjq8fRFauw1QoYUYzqA==
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 20:18:45 +0000
Message-ID: <MWHPR17MB1071230707C1DFC2AA96FE1DA7D00@MWHPR17MB1071.namprd17.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=DBanks@ddti.net;
x-originating-ip: [4.53.197.18]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: bd0da427-d81f-476d-6238-08d3f6cacc87
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; MWHPR17MB1072; 6:AjZKFAHIgO2g60kEhceKec37uCKS4LDsfnKjQ3W0WV/2dbdPeiq7xgH8tOj0hPtxl3uGycRM/Zd0tcNXJXhg1NmPOBrDxcBv/HZR7xO4gFNQ1zQ5JbotAW9OpRiCxkTWm/tgVbc/Eu+TgHBVvf8KZKSRffrVysQbDWcETuE3nLmCikGrBrNunJg1MLiEr+Ze7okVSb8b/JGzmnfyTh+d6g6fAOI0DU6b18nWoKRuPRI5d9LXA8H8aMASEpGKiKoO3t6N+KAGrSwn0NYQ9swdieymC5xCdM3KwUkugaQZRHCwpKk3fANMdnEXz+GUTgjO; 5:0aZOW2//Cpx8MpJwkqg5UB24qVX73V14kqhspGxbW2cxl5jff9aSaudemA0Bgl20k5Rnl5n6Mzy1GWCyJ+dGyi0J3vTyMP3gaDvQfP3BEP2OGRvRlXZDXxaooqMzxNt0pGNZ/ke+WlBMc05RwIo80w==; 24:MdDtnEkppWrhNWQV/XOC2AmphnYMHH2FWcwtmbQ1pCF5pDiryNzGSNDpBgMe6eofCN8PUh4P5v69RW4lbmk99SJVZnlW774TkyA6cQbBIr8=; 7:0GDfOm62AmKiBt/HLqL7Mq5HJgHp5Gqgud6I/oPxAOel7Mfs3nYA6PV1Z1yOSKg6mog4AL5kO5j6Dmp7MUJLLZsAlBBykFqzXHtkFJweGHtl6nWJrBT+q7bPtNamQZbFMBuNJ7CCTDQ58rDxX6S3QqspOFvAC4hjq4V+fWVFjEjXzehN1VvGA+UfWg8FGGNnlhCZHsN9cT2S8I/yK/Bc4Pnh3ygNOyo2/BSfV/zu/jJyR2pLTvue6wF8tN+hyJ5qLWZZctgfc10TDXbyBOxLvcQ0w53LvWmlP1j49DdUWby8Z170DiRK2QfpgaX3hDMFVs2NTMR6VDB5O5uZEEmqttZZiVQno1CSrzWZwjOpjNI=
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:MWHPR17MB1072;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MWHPR17MB10724D3CC3789A5A6A24694FA7D00@MWHPR17MB1072.namprd17.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(158342451672863)(21748063052155);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040176)(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(10201501046)(3002001); SRVR:MWHPR17MB1072; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:MWHPR17MB1072;
x-forefront-prvs: 0098BA6C6C
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(7916002)(189002)(199003)(5660300001)(2906002)(68736007)(9686002)(189998001)(10400500002)(80792005)(8936002)(110136003)(81166006)(81156014)(1730700003)(7846002)(7696004)(8676002)(5640700001)(77096005)(5630700001)(87936001)(3846002)(102836003)(19625215002)(74316002)(586003)(230783001)(2900100001)(790700001)(66066001)(15975445007)(6116002)(4326007)(76576001)(3660700001)(6916009)(3280700002)(5002640100001)(54356999)(2351001)(229853001)(7736002)(101416001)(92566002)(2501003)(16236675004)(50986999)(33656002)(11100500001)(86362001)(97736004)(105586002)(99286002)(106356001)(122556002)(19300405004)(19580395003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:MWHPR17MB1072; H:MWHPR17MB1071.namprd17.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: ddti.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_MWHPR17MB1071230707C1DFC2AA96FE1DA7D00MWHPR17MB1071namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: ddti.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 17 Oct 2016 20:18:45.2272 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 4c0f48ba-5f29-44b1-b29c-1aff8251101b
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MWHPR17MB1072
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ecrit/4gxvZ4BPa1N-W1-UNd6D18TWc1k>
Cc: "Rosen, Brian (Brian.Rosen@neustar.biz)" <Brian.Rosen@neustar.biz>
Subject: [Ecrit] draft-ietf-ecrit-similar-location-03 feedback - additional
X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ecrit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ecrit/>
List-Post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 20:18:52 -0000

There is one thing I would like to add to the feedback which I sent recently on the similar location draft:

Section 4 discusses briefly the possibility of the server limiting the number of returned similar locations.  Although the current text expresses the general idea that there may be a few that are the "most likely" to be the correct location, there are also scenarios where many similar locations could all be equally likely, and the server might need to simply cut off the list at a reasonable count.  In those situations, I believe it would be helpful if the server indicated when such  a limit is actually applied.

I suggest that an attribute be added to the locationValidation element of the findService response, perhaps rli:similarLocationsLimited, having a data type of boolean, with instructions that a server SHOULD include this attribute if the number of returned similar locations is limited due to configuration or policy.

Dan Banks

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status