[Ecrit] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-ecrit-car-crash-22: (with COMMENT)
"Stephen Farrell" <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Thu, 19 January 2017 14:51 UTC
Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: ecrit@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFB9412941A; Thu, 19 Jan 2017 06:51:17 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.40.3
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <148483747797.10305.8523660705109689253.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 06:51:17 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ecrit/H7fiQ-7tVaub-EIeE_E1mlANg8k>
Cc: ecrit@ietf.org, allison.mankin@gmail.com, draft-ietf-ecrit-car-crash@ietf.org, ecrit-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: [Ecrit] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-ecrit-car-crash-22: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
List-Id: <ecrit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ecrit/>
List-Post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 14:51:20 -0000
Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ecrit-car-crash-22: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ecrit-car-crash/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- A phone call that can unlock the doors and turn on an in-car camera. What could possibly go wrong? I think the security considerations ought warn more specifically about the consequences of these options. This is not a discuss as I assume that these features are required by US regulators, and so cannot be removed. If they were under IETF control, I'd want to DISCUSS removing them entirely as I suspect that the overall cost/benefit of these features would imply we'd be better off without them.
- [Ecrit] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-i… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Ecrit] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on dra… Randall Gellens