Re: [Ecrit] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-ecrit-location-profile-registry-policy-01: (with COMMENT)

[Randall Gellens <[e-mail]>]

On 23 Mar 2021, at 13:07, Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker wrote:

> Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-ecrit-location-profile-registry-policy-01: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut 
> this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to 
> https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ecrit-location-profile-registry-policy/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Section 4
>
>    IANA is requested to change the policy of the Location-to-Service
>    Translation (LoST) Location Profile Registry (established by
>    [RFC5222]) to Specification Required.  The expert reviewer is
>    designated by the responsible area director.  The reviewer should
>    verify that:
>
> (nit) per RFC 8126, the DE is "appointed by the IESG, normally upon
> recommendation by the relevant Area Director", which is not quite
> aligned with the "designated by the responsible area director" text 
> used
> here.

Hi Benjamin,

Thank you for your review.  I'm happy to change:

The expert reviewer is designated by the responsible area director.

to:

The expert reviewer is designated per [RFC8126].

--Randall