[Ecrit] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8148 (6978)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 23 May 2022 04:29 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CDC4C3A4B6E for <ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 May 2022 21:29:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.645
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.645 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pt7GKexcn-jC for <ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 May 2022 21:29:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E1FEC06D93F for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 May 2022 21:29:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 0E1ACEEA13; Sun, 22 May 2022 21:29:29 -0700 (PDT)
To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: rg+ietf@coretechnologyconsulting.com, rg+ietf@coretechnologyconsulting.com, br@brianrosen.net, Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net, ecrit@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20220523042929.0E1ACEEA13@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 22 May 2022 21:29:29 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ecrit/NP2KM0q9sl1SInYPzAHFand4yxI>
Subject: [Ecrit] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8148 (6978)
X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: Emergency Context Resolution with Internet Technologies <ecrit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ecrit/>
List-Post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 May 2022 04:29:33 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8148, "Next-Generation Vehicle-Initiated Emergency Calls". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6978 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@coretechnologyconsulting.com> Section: 15.1. Normative Ref Original Text ------------- <https://www.apcointl.org/ resources/telematics/aacn-and-veds.html> Corrected Text -------------- https://www.apcointl.org/resources/telematics/aacnveds/ veds-scheme-a-supporting-documentation/ Notes ----- The URL was changed during the RFC preparation process. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC8148 (draft-ietf-ecrit-car-crash-23) -------------------------------------- Title : Next-Generation Vehicle-Initiated Emergency Calls Publication Date : May 2017 Author(s) : R. Gellens, B. Rosen, H. Tschofenig Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Emergency Context Resolution with Internet Technologies Area : Applications and Real-Time Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Ecrit] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8148 (6978) RFC Errata System