Re: [Ecrit] Content-ID: Way forward without SIPCORE impact

[Christer Holmberg <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

>>  One way to solve the Content-ID issue would be to ALWAYS use a 
>> multipart MIME, even if we only carry one body part. See example in 
>> section 12.2.2.3 of RFC 6086.
>>
>>  Another advantage would be that we would always the same 
>> Content-Disposition header field value for the MSD/control body parts. 
>> Currently the value is dependent on whether there are other body parts 
>> in the message or not, which is a little strange. So, the 
>> multipart/MIME would have C-D:info-package and the MSD/control body 
>> part would have C-D:by-reference.
>
> In view of the slow progress of your draft, I think the proposal to 
> always use a multipart is the best option.  As you say, it simplifies 
> the implementation because the C-D will always be "By-Reference".
>
> (As I recall, the same idea was floated some time back, during the 
> discussion about INFO.)

So, unless someone objects, I suggest we move forward with such approach. 

Also, I'd like to see the a new version of the draft BEFORE the end of the WGLC, so that I can perform a WGLC review based on that.

Regards,

Christer