Re: [Ecrit] Objection to draft-ietf-ecrit-ecall progressing to state "Submitted to IESG for Publication"

I object to your objection.

Despite your characterization, there is no technical issue here.  Everyone agrees on how the mechanism works.  There is an editorial issue on interpreting the word “attached”.  I don’t object to wordsmithing to make it more clear, but it’s not a technical problem and it can be dealt with any time before publication.

Brian

> On Nov 29, 2016, at 2:57 PM, Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I also indicated (18th October) that I want to solve the issues before we move the draft forward. There have also been suggestions on how to solve issues. 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Christer
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ecrit [mailto:ecrit-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ivo Sedlacek
> Sent: 28 November 2016 12:08
> To: ecrit@ietf.org
> Subject: [Ecrit] Objection to draft-ietf-ecrit-ecall progressing to state "Submitted to IESG for Publication"
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I noticed that WG state of draft-ietf-ecrit-ecall changed to "Submitted to IESG for Publication" despite a comment (ISSUE 7 in the attached) raised during WGLC was not resolved, even though the issue was confirmed by other people and even though it was requested that the issue is solved before publication request.
> 
> I am formally objecting to this state change.
> 
> Kind regards
> 
> Ivo Sedlacek
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ecrit mailing list
> Ecrit@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit