IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ecrit] [IANA #658921] General Request for Assignment (urn-serviceid-labels)

"DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com> Wed, 20 March 2013 01:49 UTC

Return-Path: <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DC2121F8782 for <ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 18:49:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ac3wNKvgGxvD for <ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 18:49:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ihemail1.lucent.com (ihemail1.lucent.com [135.245.0.33]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ECDC21F86DE for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 18:49:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from us70uusmtp4.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (h135-5-2-66.lucent.com [135.5.2.66]) by ihemail1.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id r2K1n5vX015045 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 19 Mar 2013 20:49:05 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from US70UWXCHHUB02.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (us70uwxchhub02.zam.alcatel-lucent.com [135.5.2.49]) by us70uusmtp4.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id r2K1n5MS025721 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 19 Mar 2013 21:49:05 -0400
Received: from FR711WXCHHUB02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (135.239.2.112) by US70UWXCHHUB02.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (135.5.2.49) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.247.3; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 21:49:05 -0400
Received: from FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.7.201]) by FR711WXCHHUB02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.112]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 02:49:03 +0100
From: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [Ecrit] [IANA #658921] General Request for Assignment (urn-serviceid-labels)
Thread-Index: AQHOJN0HiPQAg8Uiuk+EGiwTaCC+Ppitz4/g
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 01:49:02 +0000
Message-ID: <949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8B0184C8@FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <CD6E08DB.3F093%mlinsner@cisco.com> <B321B1C2-086E-441B-B7C5-D0130587B851@neustar.biz> <CABkgnnVkgE8d=iKz2PY4tGaZxvHFoauPP53rM0zTyrB3Ef70vA@mail.gmail.com> <949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8B01831C@FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com> <CABkgnnW4RcuPOcD5UsifeCN65_9mDJMkrMz_hkcg2UAkvanPnQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnW4RcuPOcD5UsifeCN65_9mDJMkrMz_hkcg2UAkvanPnQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.239.27.41]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.33
Cc: "Rosen, Brian" <Brian.Rosen@neustar.biz>, "ecrit@ietf.org" <ecrit@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ecrit] [IANA #658921] General Request for Assignment (urn-serviceid-labels)
X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ecrit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ecrit>
List-Post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 01:49:08 -0000

These are two different concepts.

In the URN, this is about distinguishing between two (or more) different types of police force, i.e. municipal police versus FBI, or whatever.

Whatever the value of the URN you still want the PSAP that serves your area, be that the municipal police or the FBI.

Keith

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Thomson [mailto:martin.thomson@gmail.com]
> Sent: 19 March 2013 20:03
> To: DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
> Cc: Rosen, Brian; ecrit@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Ecrit] [IANA #658921] General Request for Assignment (urn-
> serviceid-labels)
> 
> On 19 March 2013 12:27, DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
> <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:
> > Martin Thomson wrote:
> >
> >> I agree with Brian, "local" is not just ambiguous, it's redundant.
> >> "urn:service:sos.police.local" is semantically equivalent to
> >> "urn:service:sos.police".
> >>
> >
> > I disagree with the last part of this.
> 
> I think that you missed my point.  By nature, all urn:service:sos
> sub-services are local.  That's why LoST exists.  Adding ".local" is
> redundant.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email