Re: [Ecrit] I-D Action: draft-rosen-ecrit-service-urn-subregistries-00.txt

Brian Rosen <br@brianrosen.net> Tue, 20 December 2016 15:05 UTC

Return-Path: <br@brianrosen.net>
X-Original-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA0751299EC for <ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 07:05:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.14
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.14 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=brianrosen-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a2TYI2oZ2NdH for <ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 07:05:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yw0-f176.google.com (mail-yw0-f176.google.com [209.85.161.176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24BBA1299E8 for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 07:05:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yw0-f176.google.com with SMTP id i145so83525456ywg.2 for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 07:05:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=brianrosen-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references :to; bh=TAA2ntLlTXhtpQd304sT3J2T3RSGGUyALGgm8GW8q1Q=; b=wE9PF/Kog6ADAEy2xdwF7iPIdcUEIfelyS9GujZWTrQOjO2CSzDV8/Uwe5ICuv4wih JliFj0YdEuhNa3oiYRwmAO7B8w5epwTf16v2n7F6ynfGMV8DslgmPgeU1SQqZUv1QAoS ZDvZFbwBg3irTO7qBDuXgTF+J/ztO6o6PTyg5OCTWvj8/wzU/uQrZd499bK7qs++kyuN RR9BTzYItoII8ZJKToh5U8Uo94LO/I/9CPlq6KGjcD8xvUmhS4GS6dje3PI+zYo1b2Cw CdfwWSBNuHdOVdjnuXYgzfIw5YLmZnKnmp0lXwwgrfOGjL3KVR4keB8LQ8caSgs1vvwW t7Mg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=TAA2ntLlTXhtpQd304sT3J2T3RSGGUyALGgm8GW8q1Q=; b=VZLqt3fKJlKq56BnOPdi2c79I64KT2NObFnc9KImhPRMqGcDtssjnNMSlWnzyy4tYF 70/Q9a+XfJ9yRJPckYTqLaN/Ep2I1DImJHMxhcgchY7R3hyVkWBId/qKIDLGRNxnJeSw +AsrQa+Esu+UhVtrHi4fmfASGSWQvynro1h2k9/5NGki10ZEmri5sP/bLI++jJSC/tO/ JHPc7gSUuGoF/bShvBIL5/PwFXputP+YAI+S8/y+5v6WO2sFt1MjY2v82B55gDegQbsf gBzX/OBY4CyKDZtVUEzKCRFlwv6aqgd0NNv7TU41UhToblbJ77OyPfRoUUBM45cIKgbG tQGQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXI+3Ptpr+IyAs/BKscIkQFeR0M/JtGdio70Hb18519CrYuwkq0h+/NdvGD7THez7w==
X-Received: by 10.129.166.214 with SMTP id d205mr4732172ywh.170.1482246272171; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 07:04:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.33.192.26] ([156.154.81.54]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w184sm9307255ywe.16.2016.12.20.07.04.31 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 20 Dec 2016 07:04:31 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F014B8C5-23E0-4AC0-B409-6D21B28C6B9D"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Brian Rosen <br@brianrosen.net>
In-Reply-To: <AM5PR0701MB2468356AEB66DF2D791718E7E5900@AM5PR0701MB2468.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 10:04:28 -0500
Message-Id: <BF57D33D-CCBF-4F9D-B131-4BEF1AC2F508@brianrosen.net>
References: <148192031155.14691.15926529065829067237.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <80337302-56F1-4A10-A531-14C09A499B6B@brianrosen.net> <AM5PR0701MB2468356AEB66DF2D791718E7E5900@AM5PR0701MB2468.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
To: Ivo Sedlacek <ivo.sedlacek@ericsson.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ecrit/adTWIpSW2RQyQMqNHUfNrANsSRA>
Cc: ECRIT <ecrit@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ecrit] I-D Action: draft-rosen-ecrit-service-urn-subregistries-00.txt
X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ecrit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ecrit/>
List-Post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 15:05:35 -0000

Thanks for your comments.

Although the ABNF allows it, I think that it’s much cleaner to have the separate registries.  I will note that we have allowed the registration in the existing registry, although if/when this document is published, we will remove it from the main sos registry and put it in the police sub registry.  I have consulted with IANA on this.

I was careful to note that the token is NOT the name of the service, and trying to actually have the token be the actual name of the service will lead to many, many registrations that are effectively duplicates of one another.  Any police force which has true national scope would use the same token.  In the US, for example, it’s the FBI.

However, I do think “national” is actually a better token for this service, and I will change it in the next version.  However, I would not want to see a registration for the FBI, nor any other specific name for a national police force.  Having said that, in many countries, there are several national police forces with specialized responsibilities.  In the U.S., we have U.S. Marshalls, Drug Enforcement Agency, Immigration and Customs. Secret Service, and several others.  We don’t have emergency calling to them, so we don’t need sos tokens for them, but there are countries where there are more than one national police that do have emergency numbers and we will need tokens for them.  I would not want a “city” token instead of “municipal”.

At one point I was thinking of explicitly referencing the “A” levels from PIDF-LO for these tokens (so “A1” instead of “Provincial” and A2 instead of “Municipal”), but eventually decided that since we didn’t have A levels for all the tokens we would need that it didn’t make sense to use the A levels as the token name.  But I intended the tokens to be used that way.

Brian

> On Dec 20, 2016, at 8:58 AM, Ivo Sedlacek <ivo.sedlacek@ericsson.com> wrote:
> 
> Hello,
>  
> Two comments to the draft:
>  
> Comment-1:
> rfc5031 defines sub-services using the following ABNF where several sub-services can be included in a service URN.
>  
>  
>      service-URN  = "URN:service:" service
>     service      = top-level *("." sub-service)
>      top-level    = let-dig [ *25let-dig-hyp let-dig ]
>      sub-service  = let-dig [ *let-dig-hyp let-dig ]
>      let-dig-hyp  = let-dig / "-"
>      let-dig      = ALPHA / DIGIT
>      ALPHA        = %x41-5A / %x61-7A   ; A-Z / a-z
>      DIGIT        = %x30-39 ; 0-9
>  
> rfc7163 allows registration of additional sub-services of the service URN with the 'sos' service type using expert review.
>  
> Thus, registration of sub-services under urn:service.sos.police (under urn:service.sos.ambulance, and under urn:service.sos.fire) is possible already now and there should be no need to define new subregistries.
>  
> Comment-2:
>  
> The proposed new police emergency services do not address the needs of the Czech republic as:
> - Czech republic defines emergency service of national police; and
> - Czech republic is not a federation of states or provinces (and thus "federal" does not fit).
> Proposal: change "federal" to "national".
>  
> Kind regards
>  
> Ivo Sedlacek
>  
>  
> From: Ecrit [mailto:ecrit-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:ecrit-bounces@ietf.org>] On Behalf Of Brian Rosen
> Sent: Friday, December 16, 2016 9:33 PM
> To: ECRIT <ecrit@ietf.org <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>>
> Subject: [Ecrit] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-rosen-ecrit-service-urn-subregistries-00.txt
>  
> FYI
> 
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
>  
> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org>
> Subject: I-D Action: draft-rosen-ecrit-service-urn-subregistries-00.txt
> Date: December 16, 2016 at 3:31:51 PM EST
> To: <i-d-announce@ietf.org <mailto:i-d-announce@ietf.org>>
> Reply-To: internet-drafts@ietf.org <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org>
>  
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> 
> 
>        Title           : A Subregistry for urn:service:sos.police, fire and ambulance
>        Author          : Brian Rosen
>             Filename        : draft-rosen-ecrit-service-urn-subregistries-00.txt
>             Pages           : 5
>             Date            : 2016-12-16
> 
> Abstract:
>   In most countries, there are multiple kinds of police forces.
>   RFC5031 defines a "Service URN" which is used to route emergency
>   calls.  The urn has a sub registry for different kinds of emergency
>   services that may be reached from different telephone numbers or
>   service numbers (as opposed to a single number like 112).  In many
>   countries, the "police" service is not a single service, but more
>   than one service where the service area and/or types of emergencies
>   they respond to are different.  In some countries there are multiple
>   ambulance services.  This document defines sub registries for
>   urn:service:sos.police, urn:service:sos.ambulance and, for
>   completeness, urn:service:sos.fire.  It also provides an initial set
>   of entries for these sub registries.  These services are in addition
>   to the base urn:service:sos.police, etc. services.
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rosen-ecrit-service-urn-subregistries/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rosen-ecrit-service-urn-subregistries/>
> 
> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rosen-ecrit-service-urn-subregistries-00 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rosen-ecrit-service-urn-subregistries-00>
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org <http://tools.ietf.org/>.
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ <ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> I-D-Announce mailing list
> I-D-Announce@ietf.org <mailto:I-D-Announce@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce>
> Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html <http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html>
> or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt <ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt>