[Ecrit] [Errata Rejected] RFC5031 (6359)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 22 December 2020 17:38 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 232AD3A11BD; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 09:38:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w7kAx0k6tdKS; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 09:38:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 804753A11BC; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 09:38:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 8F802F40752; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 09:38:31 -0800 (PST)
To: worley@ariadne.com, hgs+ecrit@cs.columbia.edu
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: barryleiba@computer.org, iesg@ietf.org, ecrit@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20201222173831.8F802F40752@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 09:38:31 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ecrit/fYzYeSX1S7NvzUfGWDoygnKepXs>
Subject: [Ecrit] [Errata Rejected] RFC5031 (6359)
X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ecrit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ecrit/>
List-Post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 17:38:51 -0000
The following errata report has been rejected for RFC5031, "A Uniform Resource Name (URN) for Emergency and Other Well-Known Services". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6359 -------------------------------------- Status: Rejected Type: Editorial Reported by: Dale R. Worley <worley@ariadne.com> Date Reported: 2020-12-19 Rejected by: Barry Leiba (IESG) Section: 4.2, 7.2 Original Text ------------- In section 4.2: The 'sos' service type describes emergency services requiring an immediate response, typically offered by various branches of the government or other public institutions. Corrected Text -------------- In section 4.2, add a reference: The 'sos' service type describes emergency services requiring an immediate response, typically offered by various branches of the government or other public institutions. [IRC] In section 7.2, add a reference: [IRC] Service Regulations annexed to the International Radiotelegraphic Convention, Berlin, 1906, section 6. a., article XVI. https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=hvd.32044103239133&view=1up&seq=36 Notes ----- The referenced section of the protocols of the convention is "Ships in distress make use of the following signal: . . . - - - . . . repeated at short intervals. ...". --VERIFIER NOTES-- Thanks for suggesting the reference, and it's interesting to have a source that shows where the "sos" term started. It's not an error, though: the RFC is correct as published, and there was never an intent to cite a reference there. So as an errata report, this is rejected... with encouragement for interested readers to look at the historic reference. -------------------------------------- RFC5031 (draft-ietf-ecrit-service-urn-07) -------------------------------------- Title : A Uniform Resource Name (URN) for Emergency and Other Well-Known Services Publication Date : January 2008 Author(s) : H. Schulzrinne Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Emergency Context Resolution with Internet Technologies RAI Area : Real-time Applications and Infrastructure Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Ecrit] [Errata Rejected] RFC5031 (6359) RFC Errata System