Re: [Ecrit] IETF87 Berlin: ECRIT Minutes for 07/29 meeting

"DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com> Sun, 04 August 2013 21:13 UTC

Return-Path: <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71A0521F8F4A for <ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Aug 2013 14:13:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UYZmeW0Slsha for <ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Aug 2013 14:13:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ihemail4.lucent.com (ihemail4.lucent.com [135.245.0.39]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B95DD21E8093 for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Aug 2013 14:13:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (h135-239-2-122.lucent.com [135.239.2.122]) by ihemail4.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id r74LDXeJ020269 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sun, 4 Aug 2013 16:13:39 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711wxchhub01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.111]) by fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id r74LDXbv019369 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sun, 4 Aug 2013 23:13:33 +0200
Received: from FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.7.194]) by FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.111]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Sun, 4 Aug 2013 23:13:32 +0200
From: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: Roger Marshall <RMarshall@telecomsys.com>, "ecrit@ietf.org" <ecrit@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: IETF87 Berlin: ECRIT Minutes for 07/29 meeting
Thread-Index: Ac6OhCQgz29EQSgj+0yOnhJk0Ba5JwC00COA
Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2013 21:13:32 +0000
Message-ID: <949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8B07BE83@FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <FBD5AAFFD0978846BF6D3FAB4C892ACC3A6680@SEA-EXMB-2.telecomsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <FBD5AAFFD0978846BF6D3FAB4C892ACC3A6680@SEA-EXMB-2.telecomsys.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.239.27.39]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8B07BE83FR712WXCHMBA11zeu_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.39
Subject: Re: [Ecrit] IETF87 Berlin: ECRIT Minutes for 07/29 meeting
X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ecrit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ecrit>
List-Post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2013 21:13:57 -0000

In regard to:

"ACTION: Hannes to send milestone updates to the mailing list.

 - draft-ietf-ecrit-trustworthy-location

- draft-ietf-ecrit-unauthenticated-access

- draft-ietf-ecrit-country-emg-urn"

While I do have have any issue with keeping the working group informed, the final say on milestones is between the AD and the working group chairs, none of which have been given consequent actions, so I am unclear of what the result of the above action is. There needs to be a consequent intended action.

In regard to:


"There was a discussion about splitting the document into eCall and ACN drafts. An eCall specific draft is currently not covered in the charter.



ACTION: Chairs to work with the ADs on rechartering to do specific eCall work.
"

While I agree with the comment from Ted that the eCall specific work is out of charter, I am also of the view that the ACN work is out of the charter for other reasons, and I said at the mic that it was all out of scope. Further there are good reasons for saying ACN should be dispatched first.

Keith


________________________________
From: ecrit-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ecrit-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Roger Marshall
Sent: 01 August 2013 07:56
To: ecrit@ietf.org
Cc: Randall Gellens (randy@qti.qualcomm.com); A. Jean Mahoney (mahoney@nostrum.com)
Subject: [Ecrit] IETF87 Berlin: ECRIT Minutes for 07/29 meeting

Minutes for ECRIT WG Meeting, IETF87 Berlin, meeting date 7/29/2013, 13:00-15:00

If you have any additions or modifications to these minutes, please let
Roger & Marc know via email.  These minutes, along with more detailed notes are pasted below, and are also posted to the IETF87
meeting materials page.