[Ecrit] AD review: draft-ietf-ecrit-trustworthy-location
Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> Fri, 14 February 2014 21:28 UTC
Return-Path: <rlb@ipv.sx>
X-Original-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D5B71A0449 for <ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:28:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IFVlPud8uSeu for <ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:28:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ob0-f180.google.com (mail-ob0-f180.google.com [209.85.214.180]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A64671A03BA for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:28:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ob0-f180.google.com with SMTP id wp4so14488477obc.39 for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:28:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=EHzf/nuiw2eZFIMYViqgQ1/E8CLfeqFYp3bGpn70SGo=; b=R2iNxO2PhkgnvpqgkoSJW5lV4dmDB68cE6zzfw4bGY/E/aBidSoQea3KSU6bd5Mdhi 7eYoxW/hTwuyezEmiUoEOkyfQcPfdrp+ENtDAeP/T/WMFF4WymiyjiUNMZ/esz6nm9N8 lUuEoQW27tCNFsmi8hxHnZ05UFk59Xo267l1iZY59OS1+Vjqe/NaKJpSL7udGye1NuQs 9s2lMMyDCe5xyyUW2GfyCXlbgh57RP01uhMtWYpwdDl7+R14Z4SZwzmLGk7vblIbV3Cb s1vkMjwr/KQoN9LnIHzZ3re79rBoedXBn0MRyCdwZB6c1ucs2Vw+gIidFbhN0ITlMe0s Nqpg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlD3oNGj7ubJHXPu4Qr5h4w/lxZPumCosqIo6vyEYZNC/t/nuxrJVWE5WDktfLC+fSGDUlH
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.148.106 with SMTP id tr10mr3021154obb.65.1392413305866; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:28:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.60.69.102 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:28:25 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:28:25 -0500
Message-ID: <CAL02cgSeRQYEac+4Z7nwMq3rBYwj2PT8j6BoGxJ6ADykm-vkxw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
To: "ecrit@ietf.org" <ecrit@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-ecrit-trustworthy-location@tools.ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e012940d87a774e04f2647c69"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ecrit/iwm1lEvg_N0Tf_py05zAL-w9r2w
Subject: [Ecrit] AD review: draft-ietf-ecrit-trustworthy-location
X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ecrit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ecrit/>
List-Post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 21:28:44 -0000
I have reviewed this draft in preparation for IETF LC. Overall, it's in good shape, and I have requested the LC. A couple of minor comments to address with any LC comments: Section 1.1: The definition of "trustworthy location" is circular. Suggest deleting "...and has been assessed as trustworthy". Section 1.1: "Time-shifting" is more traditionally known as a "replay attack". Might be helpful to note this correspondence. Thanks, --Richard
- [Ecrit] AD review: draft-ietf-ecrit-trustworthy-l… Richard Barnes