[Ecrit] Revised Abstract in draft-ietf-ecrit-similar-location-18
Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@randy.pensive.org> Wed, 02 March 2022 20:44 UTC
Return-Path: <rg+ietf@randy.pensive.org>
X-Original-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D55063A0D0F; Wed, 2 Mar 2022 12:44:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mlwaLpSj7UOQ; Wed, 2 Mar 2022 12:44:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from turing.pensive.org (turing.pensive.org [99.111.97.161]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B4653A0CFA; Wed, 2 Mar 2022 12:44:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [99.111.97.171] (99.111.97.161) by turing.pensive.org with ESMTP (EIMS X 3.3.9); Wed, 2 Mar 2022 11:32:30 -0800
From: Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@randy.pensive.org>
To: Brian Rosen <br@brianrosen.net>
Cc: last-call@ietf.org, ecrit@ietf.org, draft-ietf-ecrit-similar-location.all@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2022 11:32:30 -0800
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13.2r5673)
Message-ID: <93B002DF-9563-48D1-82B6-DC1FFBCE541F@randy.pensive.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ecrit/kzstHYmIb4RYGK1kMdRRCma7kko>
Subject: [Ecrit] Revised Abstract in draft-ietf-ecrit-similar-location-18
X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Emergency Context Resolution with Internet Technologies <ecrit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ecrit/>
List-Post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2022 20:44:46 -0000
Please consider replacing the Abstract from:
This document describes an extension to the LoST protocol that is
specified in RFC 5222 that allows additional civic location
information to be returned in the <locationValidation> element of a
<findServiceResponse>. This extension supports two use cases.
First, when the input location is incomplete, the LoST server can
provide a complete intended unique address. Second, when the input
location is invalid, the LoST server can identify one or more
feasible locations. This extension is applicable when the location
information in the <findService> request uses the Basic Civic profile
as described in RFC 5222
To:
This document describes an extension to the LoST protocol of RFC
5222 that allows additional civic location information to be
returned in a <findServiceResponse>. This extension supports two
use cases: First, when the input location is valid but lacks some
Civic Address elements, the LoST server can provide a completed
form. Second, when the input location is invalid, the LoST
server can identify one or more feasible ("similar") locations.
This extension is applicable when the location information in the
<findService> request uses the Basic Civic profile as described
in RFC 5222 or another profile whose definition provides
instructions concerning its use with this extension.
--Randall
- [Ecrit] Revised Abstract in draft-ietf-ecrit-simi… Randall Gellens