IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ecrit] draft-ietf-ecrit-additional-data-11: Question on possible conflict between language feature tag and data provider language, defined in section 3.1.6

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Tue, 06 August 2013 15:57 UTC

Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC33821F9E4F for <ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Aug 2013 08:57:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.821
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.821 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.427, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uVVlWdALIjt5 for <ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Aug 2013 08:57:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw2.ericsson.se (mailgw2.ericsson.se [193.180.251.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FE7621F99A2 for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Aug 2013 08:56:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb25-b7f826d000001766-99-52011cca1c32
Received: from ESESSHC005.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw2.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 1C.B5.05990.ACC11025; Tue, 6 Aug 2013 17:56:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ESESSMB209.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.135]) by ESESSHC005.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.33]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Tue, 6 Aug 2013 17:56:57 +0200
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: Brian Rosen <br@brianrosen.net>
Thread-Topic: [Ecrit] draft-ietf-ecrit-additional-data-11: Question on possible conflict between language feature tag and data provider language, defined in section 3.1.6
Thread-Index: Ac6Ss7RGKH4c9vYBRvaO2LXJyDkPv///67sAgAAl+ryAAAIL3A==
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2013 15:56:57 +0000
Message-ID: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C41EAC6@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
References: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C41E829@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>, <CAOPrzE1SgvCGP8R2B=pUzz9KjPjOyHY-x4wHu-h4JP7FWUCVKQ@mail.gmail.com>, <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C41E9B5@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C41E9B5@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C41EAC6ESESSMB209erics_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFrrJLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvre5pGcYgg//zOCye3p/GZtG46Cmr A5PH/W9/2T2WLPnJFMAUxWWTkpqTWZZapG+XwJXx8exvloLPVhVfVgs0MH4z7mLk5JAQMJH4 u+g/C4QtJnHh3nq2LkYuDiGBw4wSjf+6WSGcxYwSX89uYepi5OBgE7CQ6P6nDdIgIqAssfNW JztImBnIPtEZD1IuLLCWUeLpv2WMII6IwDpGibu3trFDNDhJfNl9mhHEZhFQkfj07RobiM0r 4CvReGUKO8Sy64wSy5YcZwJJcAr4SfT1TWQFsRmBzvt+ag1YnFlAXOLWk/lMEGcLSCzZc54Z whaVePn4HytETb7EvtvHmSEWCEqcnPmEZQKjyCwk7bOQlM1CUgYRN5B4f24+M4StLbFs4Wso W19i45ezjMjiCxjZVzGy5yZm5qSXG21iBEbPwS2/VXcw3jkncohRmoNFSZx3s96ZQCGB9MSS 1OzU1ILUovii0pzU4kOMTBycUg2MfsxLd+puvTv36NEfU/nOqX3l73ZPT1RWXTLn6dkFeyUi LjH4rD5w5U1vdm9ooOYUd0YRztrSdKX6T/7m3/LZJztvEr075fnDDr+oj0eWCl39WrLWim1t 3pnezAMMRXXWwVVvZyY52be85Gb7Ov05r8cKh+wjKpIKc/wOdSXpTHmldLQ4IjBFiaU4I9FQ i7moOBEAq5LVAWwCAAA=
Cc: "ecrit_ietf.org" <ecrit@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ecrit] draft-ietf-ecrit-additional-data-11: Question on possible conflict between language feature tag and data provider language, defined in section 3.1.6
X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ecrit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ecrit>
List-Post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2013 15:57:22 -0000

As a side note, in MMUSIC it was suggested to define a new SDP attribute to indicate language capabilities, but it was rejected.

Regards,

Christer



Sent from Windows using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com)

-----Original Message-----
From: Christer Holmberg [christer.holmberg@ericsson.com]
To: Brian Rosen [br@brianrosen.net]
CC: ecrit_ietf.org [ecrit@ietf.org]
Subject: Re: [Ecrit] draft-ietf-ecrit-additional-data-11: Question on possible conflict between language feature tag and data provider language, defined in section 3.1.6
Hi,

The language media feature tag does not indicate the media language either - it indicates the languages the caller can handle.

Regards,

Christer



Sent from Windows using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com)

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Rosen [br@brianrosen.net]
To: Christer Holmberg [christer.holmberg@ericsson.com]
CC: ecrit@ietf.org [ecrit@ietf.org]
Subject: Re: [Ecrit] draft-ietf-ecrit-additional-data-11: Question on possible conflict between language feature tag and data provider language, defined in section 3.1.6
That feature is not the spoken or signed or typed language in the media.  There is an ongoing effort to provide a facility to negotiate those, but even still, it's useful to know in advance of a call what languages the service provider can handle.

Brian

On Tuesday, August 6, 2013, Christer Holmberg wrote:

Hi,



In SIP, it is possible to indicate supported languages using the “language” media feature tag, defined in RFC 3840.



Is the semantics different from the data provider language defined in the additional-data draft?



Do we need to say something about which/how to use?



Regards,



Christer

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status