Re: [Ecrit] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ecrit-ecall-26.txt

[Randall Gellens <[e-mail]>]

At 9:18 PM +0000 2/12/17, Christer Holmberg wrote:

>   >>  Question: is there intent to remove the requirement to wrap the MSD
>>>  in a multipart body once the the work in sipcore completes? Is it your
>>>  goal to future proof this text so it need not be changed to accomplish
>>>  that?
>>
>>  I think there is not much actual benefit to removing the 
>> requirement, while there is some downside: it would make the draft 
>> dependent
>>  on the content-id draft, and it would require further changes in 
>> other SDO work (e.g., 3GPP) that includes the requirement.  So I'd 
>> suggest we leave it is.
>
>  I don't think it would require any major changes in other SDOs, at 
> least not in 3GPP.

Of course it only requires minor changes, not major ones.

>  I am pretty confident the Content-ID draft will anyway be adopted 
> by 3GPP, no matter whether it's needed by ecall or not.

That's good, of course, although I don't see it as a significant 
reason to change the draft.



-- 
Randall Gellens
Opinions are personal;    facts are suspect;    I speak for myself only
-------------- Randomly selected tag: ---------------
Few ideas are really bad.  Most are either pre- or post-mature.
                                                   --Jon Postel