Re: [Ecrit] draft-ietf-ecrit-similar-location-11.txt (was: Ecrit Digest, Vol 187, Issue 52)

[Randall Gellens <[e-mail]>]

Please see inline.

--Randall

On 5 Oct 2021, at 14:01, Caron, Guy wrote:

> Inline.
>
> Guy
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Ecrit <[e-mail]> De la part de Victor Burton
> Envoyé : 1 octobre 2021 13:22
> À : [e-mail]
> Objet : [EXT]Re: [Ecrit] draft-ietf-ecrit-similar-location-11.txt 
> (was: Ecrit Digest, Vol 187, Issue 52)
>
> Introduction: Delete "timely".
> Use of this enhancement increases the likelihood that the correct 
> and/or complete
>    form of a civic location becomes timely known in those cases where 
> it
>    is incomplete or incorrect.
> [GC] I think the use of "timely" is warranted since without the 
> enhancement, the client would not even be aware of a location being 
> incomplete.

[RG] I agree with Guy; we should retain "timely".

>
> Terminology: Replace "can be" with is
> Location:  The term Location can be used to refer to either a civic 
> location or a geodetic location.

[RG] Normally I'd be in favor of replacing "can be" with "is" (since 
it's almost always better wording) but in this particular case the 
document doesn't use "Location" to refer to geodetic location, so I 
think here "can be" is better.  Or, we could say "is in general used" to 
refer to the larger scope outside this document.