Re: [Ecrit] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8148 (6500)

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Tue, 30 March 2021 06:54 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E67E3A0BC2 for <ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 23:54:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eggert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9bUFQAfuG4Vr for <ecrit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 23:54:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:211:32ff:fe22:186f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1194D3A0BC1 for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 23:54:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:1894:d982:c139:2ff9] (unknown [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:1894:d982:c139:2ff9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7AE25600076; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 09:54:35 +0300 (EEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eggert.org; s=dkim; t=1617087275; bh=09SgM5ERX4072t7IcFEY6+LFQxaSSSXODq2YE5G1XD8=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=kkZlDrQjmp+SBrwsXdQBda3siaVy8zZjS9RfDNOTdQ8Ois9Y9thQckP3FD/YKRSBF U12c4IPZXF3CYPvVBkXNL3rVmU7SGxc56qGSP1r6wBxF8e58f6qdd3CFith1KBaTQP or6mUhtuxnihAtFlfxb8bfR2+tE6Le0KJmeMwSc4=
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Message-Id: <4B0F8379-A1A5-4A1B-9650-FEFF62BF9B34@eggert.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_2A3D60D1-3C81-4909-9735-5A0419E0265D"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.21\))
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 09:54:35 +0300
In-Reply-To: <BC33DB8A-E415-4316-9976-CC8265514BCA@brianrosen.net>
Cc: Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@coretechnologyconsulting.com>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>, "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>, Francesca Palombini <francesca.palombini@ericsson.com>, Allison Mankin <allison.mankin@gmail.com>, Roger Marshall <roger.marshall@comtechtel.com>, ecrit@ietf.org
To: Brian Rosen <br@brianrosen.net>
References: <F01FF77E-FD85-48E3-B9C3-3C40D8B3C157@coretechnologyconsulting.com> <309D6418-5163-471C-A4CE-203D1DACB627@eggert.org> <BC33DB8A-E415-4316-9976-CC8265514BCA@brianrosen.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.60.0.2.21)
X-MailScanner-ID: 7AE25600076.A123D
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ecrit/xPYKU4Z46FQEiTUaYRsY20B7hx4>
Subject: Re: [Ecrit] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8148 (6500)
X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ecrit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ecrit/>
List-Post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 06:54:52 -0000

Hi,

On 2021-3-30, at 0:15, Brian Rosen <br@brianrosen.net> wrote:
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/application/EmergencyCallData.VEDS+xml
> 
> Which contains (at the bottom):
> Change controller: The IESG <ietf&ietf.org>
> 
> Noting that it’s the same as the RFC, and therefore incorrect.
> 
> What IANA page were you looking at?

that one, but I must have missed this. (Maybe it was strategically below the fold on my phone screen...)

Thanks,
Lars