Information on Certificate Exchange Message
"Pim van der Eijk" <pvde@sonnenglanz.net> Sun, 23 January 2011 12:57 UTC
Return-Path: <owner-ietf-ediint@mail.imc.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ediint-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ediint-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id E1D423A68C9 for <ietfarch-ediint-archive@core3.amsl.com>;
Sun, 23 Jan 2011 04:57:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.555
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No,
score=0.555 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001,
HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QNhdKISExYMB for
<ietfarch-ediint-archive@core3.amsl.com>;
Sun, 23 Jan 2011 04:57:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (Hoffman.Proper.COM [207.182.41.81]) by
core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06F3B3A68BF for
<ediint-archive@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Jan 2011 04:57:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
hoffman.proper.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p0NCuKfs002839
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
Sun, 23 Jan 2011 05:56:20 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from
owner-ietf-ediint@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hoffman.proper.com
(8.14.4/8.13.5/Submit) id p0NCuKpG002838;
Sun, 23 Jan 2011 05:56:20 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from
owner-ietf-ediint@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: hoffman.proper.com: majordom set sender to
owner-ietf-ediint@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from smtp-vbr2.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr2.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.22]) by
hoffman.proper.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p0NCuI24002832 for
<Ietf-ediint@imc.org>;
Sun, 23 Jan 2011 05:56:19 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from pvde@sonnenglanz.net)
Received: from Roussanne (a80-101-201-38.adsl.xs4all.nl [80.101.201.38])
(authenticated bits=0) by smtp-vbr2.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id
p0NCuBsE054118 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for
<Ietf-ediint@imc.org>;
Sun, 23 Jan 2011 13:56:18 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from pvde@sonnenglanz.net)
From: "Pim van der Eijk" <pvde@sonnenglanz.net>
To: <Ietf-ediint@imc.org>
Subject: Information on Certificate Exchange Message
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 13:56:14 +0100
Message-ID: <2E64AF941F2D465382B43EB53F4ED062@Roussanne>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000E_01CBBB05.502C6B30"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
Thread-Index: Acu6/OqGiYMbaESjQ1yL5RlnQOIkHA==
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6002.18263
X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner
Sender: owner-ietf-ediint@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-ediint/mail-archive/>
List-ID: <ietf-ediint.imc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-ediint-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Hello, Is there any information on the level of adoption of CEM? I know it has been interop-tested, and some users are using it, but is it widespread, or still early stages? Also, I am looking for an overview of how CEM relates to XKMS. Is this available somewhere? Pim
- Information on Certificate Exchange Message Pim van der Eijk