Re: [Edm] Test to EDM list

Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> Thu, 30 July 2020 07:06 UTC

Return-Path: <eckert@i4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Original-To: edm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: edm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BE093A0EF6 for <edm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 00:06:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m57KDzqNNS5Y for <edm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 00:06:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.34.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EA823A0EED for <edm@iab.org>; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 00:06:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:52]) by faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1948548044; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 09:06:08 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix, from userid 10463) id E9911440043; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 09:06:08 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 09:06:08 +0200
From: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
To: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
Cc: edm@iab.org
Message-ID: <20200730070608.GS1772@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
References: <b7b81182-508b-3225-4f2-9e725159f4f@taugh.com> <1029b50b-6985-4a8a-8cd6-8fedbe58c0c8@www.fastmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1029b50b-6985-4a8a-8cd6-8fedbe58c0c8@www.fastmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/edm/yROjCgS-rh3A2x_9gydSUnOEka4>
Subject: Re: [Edm] Test to EDM list
X-BeenThere: edm@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Evolvability, Deployability, & Maintainability \(Proposed\) Program" <edm.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/edm>, <mailto:edm-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/edm/>
List-Post: <mailto:edm@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:edm-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/edm>, <mailto:edm-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 07:06:17 -0000

Its a well established, yet badly documented part of ongoing
deployment validation ;-)

On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 12:56:48PM +1000, Martin Thomson wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2020, at 04:32, John R Levine wrote:
> > If you get this, we're both subscribed.  Aren't tools great?
> 
> Clearly not that great if you feel like you need this level of validation.
> 
> -- 
> Edm mailing list
> Edm@iab.org
> https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/edm