Re: [edu-discuss] Is the EDU team ossified?

John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Tue, 02 April 2013 21:54 UTC

Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: edu-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: edu-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6033C21F8960 for <edu-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2013 14:54:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9l4YuGAk0pdd for <edu-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2013 14:53:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bsa2.jck.com (bsa2.jck.com [70.88.254.51]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2D8521F8765 for <edu-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Apr 2013 14:53:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [198.252.137.115] (helo=JcK-HP8200.jck.com) by bsa2.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.71 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <john-ietf@jck.com>) id 1UN99G-0007Rp-Rt; Tue, 02 Apr 2013 17:53:46 -0400
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2013 17:53:39 -0400
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: Spencer Dawkins <spencer@wonderhamster.org>, Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <F3215ACC4ABFB28E42E70A5C@JcK-HP8200.jck.com>
In-Reply-To: <515B2159.7030800@wonderhamster.org>
References: <20130320104353.27601.24590.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CADnDZ893B70g3i0rTTiy6JMH26SVkwyZwGS9vhY8DqEn0CU8NA@mail.gmail.com> <CADnDZ88Gs1VvvpEsEoPyMLyHV1JeTWVXtsfs4NgYrncCdvjZ7Q@mail.gmail.c om> <514FB516.6050702@joelhalpern.com> <CADnDZ8_9ZHtNG7rVhMSCr8R9L6+MicM+LPQdaRP=_x==wAZWKA@mail.gmail.com> <290E20B455C66743BE178C5C84F124081A49EEF29D@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.u k> <CADnDZ8-Zt7fiyhr4GShB1pi+RxNopc6mHwRZz=aVYc6fwJPJLw@mail.gmail.com> <514FF8B4.70706@pi.nu> <515067B2.90507@stpeter.im> <E5702460F58067FF393C56F6@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <515100B2.2060305@stpeter.im> <6.2.5.6.2.20130326164344.0d0dc4a8@resistor.net> <5152A7D0.6050000@gmail.com> <A35754F2-48EF-4E5E-AD6C-236AD3312521@sobco.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20130327204237.0c5f7a58@resistor.net> <5154486D.1010709@wonderhamster.org> <6.2.5.6.2.20130328095537.069da4e0@resistor.net> <5154A876.3050604@wonderhamster.org> <6.2.5.6.2.20130401205741.0ac2d828@resistor.net> <CAHBDyN7XQSCTeqBX_5JXGU4g+viQVbPpANqiM8oD48UPV0eVuA@mail.gmail.com> <515B2159.7030800@wonderhamster.org>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 04 Apr 2013 08:07:55 -0700
Cc: Peter Koch <pk@denic.de>, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>, edu-discuss@ietf.org, "Moriarty, Kathleen" <kathleen.moriarty@emc.com>, Scott O Bradner <sob@sobco.com>
Subject: Re: [edu-discuss] Is the EDU team ossified?
X-BeenThere: edu-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Education Discussion <edu-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/edu-discuss>, <mailto:edu-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/edu-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:edu-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:edu-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/edu-discuss>, <mailto:edu-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2013 21:54:00 -0000

--On Tuesday, April 02, 2013 13:20 -0500 Spencer Dawkins
<spencer@wonderhamster.org> wrote:

>  > It seems you think that the
>> Tao and newcomer's training are not at all adequate.
> 
> At least on the newcomer's training, I thought I was hearing
> that the newcomer's training wasn't inadequate, just that it
> might be more comprehensive than someone attending their first
> IETF meeting might need (or be able to absorb).

And to include some unnecessarily-complicated and/or
controversial stuff and to omit some basic survival skills.  I'm
prepared to believe that the tradeoffs between what is included
and what isn't are reasonable given time, but I think the key to
getting things right (or more right) is to focus strictly on
survival and navigational materials on Sunday (or Monday),
leaving the organizational details and related material that
dominate the current presentation for the end of the week or the
second time around.

>From other threads, it sounds like "survival skills" should also
include pig-resistance skills and how/where to ask for help.

I still owe Scott (and anyone else here who is interested)
nit-picking comments on the Orlando presentation.  Maybe late
this week.

> I know I hope that most IETF participants pick up what's in
> the newcomer's training, and sooner is probably better than
> later - only that they might not need to pick it up before the
> 9 AM Monday session starts :-)

Agreed.  See above.

   john