Re: [edu-discuss] Is the EDU team ossified?

Spencer Dawkins <spencer@wonderhamster.org> Thu, 28 March 2013 20:31 UTC

Return-Path: <spencer@wonderhamster.org>
X-Original-To: edu-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: edu-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2864221F8783 for <edu-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Mar 2013 13:31:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.754
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.754 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.155, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xb0AMVgNk2dj for <edu-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Mar 2013 13:31:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.195]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 974B821F8782 for <edu-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Mar 2013 13:31:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.79] (99-108-174-213.lightspeed.rcsntx.sbcglobal.net [99.108.174.213]) by mrelay.perfora.net (node=mrus1) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0LqSG9-1UqGdM3saP-00e2ED; Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:30:56 -0400
Message-ID: <5154A876.3050604@wonderhamster.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 15:30:46 -0500
From: Spencer Dawkins <spencer@wonderhamster.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: SM <sm@resistor.net>
References: <20130320104353.27601.24590.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <5E51EF77-3D8E-4D22-A753-329CEB53CD59@istaff.org> <6.2.5.6.2.20130324123511.0abd0878@resistor.net> <CADnDZ893B70g3i0rTTiy6JMH26SVkwyZwGS9vhY8DqEn0CU8NA@mail.gmail.com> <CADnDZ88Gs1VvvpEsEoPyMLyHV1JeTWVXtsfs4NgYrncCdvjZ7Q@mail.gmail.com> <514FB516.6050702@joelhalpern.com> <CADnDZ8_9ZHtNG7rVhMSCr8R9L6+MicM+LPQdaRP=_x==wAZWKA@mail.gmail.com> <290E20B455C66743BE178C5C84F124081A49EEF29D@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk> <CADnDZ8-Zt7fiyhr4GShB1pi+RxNopc6mHwRZz=aVYc6fwJPJLw@mail.gmail.com> <514FF8B4.70706@pi.nu> <515067B2.90507@stpeter.im> <E5702460F58067FF393C56F6@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <515100B2.2060305@stpeter.im> <6.2.5.6.2.20130326164344.0d0dc4a8@resistor.net> <5152A7D0.6050000@gmail.com> <F5063677 821E3B4F81ACFB7905573F24DA7FE2E3@MX15A.corp.emc.com> <A35754F2-48EF-4E5E-AD6C-236AD3312521@sobco.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20130327204237.0c5f7a58@resistor.net> <5154486D.1010709@wonderhamster.org> <6.2.5.6.2.20130328095537.069da4e0@resistor .net>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20130328095537.069da4e0@resistor.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:7l6hExmhzpbUMgWVBpzZosOcfwHJ+Ka53r5TmKVMtzD vk0DjHYZ4ce4HFYJfbdDEiwP0vHmW0NGyAnsM27NGe5sY9NZTi mZcFQFV6e1AQweMLAWJbErJuBYh3ZV5Au8rtpMLF6J37ln9MHT aF3mUcoD/GoA1Bgci7dCNS3HhDRH5GzBSzsok0hlVhVjUQKZM2 wEz/IJVwbW+vOVYMxnyY4WLN2QPoukHod/wLAlCS4ej20PNI3j TXzGh+FTmWet/KSwv9+Z5LloocPsDwp8M6AuUVidZg4UBJW8O6 Eg8lRos52QI87hh9BBBOO6I1j8PbJGtnulGfYZ0oQK++sAJGby mtQD561JYl9hEXceuOc0fAIXd1tudnZu1vyPMJnh8
Cc: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, edu-discuss@ietf.org, "Moriarty, Kathleen" <kathleen.moriarty@emc.com>, Scott O Bradner <sob@sobco.com>, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
Subject: Re: [edu-discuss] Is the EDU team ossified?
X-BeenThere: edu-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Education Discussion <edu-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/edu-discuss>, <mailto:edu-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/edu-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:edu-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:edu-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/edu-discuss>, <mailto:edu-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 20:31:01 -0000

On 3/28/2013 1:07 PM, SM wrote:
> At 06:41 28-03-2013, Spencer Dawkins wrote:

>> It might also interact with the pairing-up that was proposed
>> immediately after IETF 86, so probably asking in a broader context
>> than edu-discuss.
>
> Someone mentioned peering on ietf@.  I don't really know how that can be
> done.  I would look at it from a broader context.  It's not like
> edu-discuss@ has to limit itself to a Sunday afternoon at a meeting.

Oh, I agree about more than Sunday afternoon. The EDU team also does 
working group chair continuing education on Wednesdays, and I don't know 
what else since I'm not on the EDU team now.

And for what it's worth, the IAB is meeting during the current Sunday 
afternoon slots - at least the first one, and maybe both - so we can't 
drop in and answer questions.

There may be things that the EDU team doesn't control, like what gets 
sent to people who register for the first time, that need to be talked 
about with the people who do control them.

That's what I meant by "broader context".

Spencer